The third question in that article (Can Roe v. Wade stand on its own?) sounds like a subtle jab at what the pro-abortion side always argues, that a fetus is not a life because it cannot survive on its own outside the womb. Interesting twist.
They claim this to sooth themselves into believing that a fetus is just a clump of cells. I AM NOT defending that positions, I'm merely stating that is how the Progs see things. If they can dehumanize a fetus by saying that it's "not life," then they can more easily rationalize killing it.
The third question in that article (Can Roe v. Wade stand on its own?) sounds like a subtle jab at what the pro-abortion side always argues, that a fetus is not a life because it cannot survive on its own outside the womb. Interesting twist.
The fetus is a life. If left alone it grows. Its abortion that ends the life.
If they claim a fetus is not a life, then why get an abortion that ends a life you claim doesnt exist?.
They claim this to sooth themselves into believing that a fetus is just a clump of cells. I AM NOT defending that positions, I'm merely stating that is how the Progs see things. If they can dehumanize a fetus by saying that it's "not life," then they can more easily rationalize killing it.
Thomas is an original thinker....