See what happens when a country TEMPORARILY allows patients to be treated with Ivermectin.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Additional data is required to make a statement indicating IVM was what made the difference (from a systems perspective health measures have many additional inputs). If one could find another nearby country that had a similar looking curve before IVM was introduced and then deviated from the one above after the new treatment was introduced solely in Slovakia, it would be a much better indicator of causality.
Well said. I'm very pro-IVM... but this evidence is weak. Especially since a competing hypothesis (an annual infection cycle) provides a viable interpretation of the data
Annual infection cycles have amplitudes. If winter brings a cycle with only a hundred deaths, then ivermectin was well worth it.