FTA: Nonetheless, the FDA describes the two as the ‘same formulation’ and ‘interchangeabl[e]’ for medical purposes.”
But Comirnaty, being FDA approved, is subject to liability, whereas the EUA version is free of all liability. This was a bait and switch scheme that took days for even diligent researchers to figure out, and Comirnaty won't be available in the US until 2023 or 2024.
And even the Doctors think they are giving the FDA approved Clot shot, that’s the shocking part. Ask your Dr. If Pfizer is approved. They don’t even know there are two versions, one approved and one not approved. The difference is a “legal” difference. One u can sue them if something goes wrong, the other is experimental and you volunteered so they are not liable if anything goes wrong. In US people are getting the experimental at this time.
Thank u for your insight, and I’m sorry u r in this bad position right now. Hopefully things will change for the better and our healthcare will be “returned to the people” along with everything else.
Yeah I heard a commercial for it on radio “go ask your pharmacist about comirnaty blah blah blah”, but the pharmacies don’t have it.
Some crazy ass disinformation campaign or something
When I read that statement from FDA to Pfizer it stated Comirnaty was approved FOR MANUFACTURE. In other words its OK to make it but NOT approved for human use.
How many of you here posted it was approved?
PS That was the very day the FDA hot-shot quit and went to Pfizer.
FTA: Nonetheless, the FDA describes the two as the ‘same formulation’ and ‘interchangeabl[e]’ for medical purposes.”
But Comirnaty, being FDA approved, is subject to liability, whereas the EUA version is free of all liability. This was a bait and switch scheme that took days for even diligent researchers to figure out, and Comirnaty won't be available in the US until 2023 or 2024.
And even the Doctors think they are giving the FDA approved Clot shot, that’s the shocking part. Ask your Dr. If Pfizer is approved. They don’t even know there are two versions, one approved and one not approved. The difference is a “legal” difference. One u can sue them if something goes wrong, the other is experimental and you volunteered so they are not liable if anything goes wrong. In US people are getting the experimental at this time.
You are so correct. And many of us in healthcare would face retaliation if we were publicly vocal about this.
Thank u for your insight, and I’m sorry u r in this bad position right now. Hopefully things will change for the better and our healthcare will be “returned to the people” along with everything else.
I wouldn't expect any less from corporate medicine....
At least we can say they never disappoint or surprise us.
Absolutely....
I’ve had this argument with my nurse neighbor. She is ADAMANT that the Pfizer vax is FDA approved.
I beg to differ.
Well didn’t a judge tell the DOD yeah not the same,better luck next time?
COMIRNATY does not exist in the United States, you can not find it anywhere.
They have a large ad campaign going on about their approved shot, while this little tidbit gets pushed out of view. Pepe remembers
enter text
Federal Judge says not interchangeable to DOD
Sorry I did not name my link
Judge rules to DOD the two Pfizer shots Distinct not Interchangeable
Yeah I heard a commercial for it on radio “go ask your pharmacist about comirnaty blah blah blah”, but the pharmacies don’t have it. Some crazy ass disinformation campaign or something
The FDA could confirm it's available and I'd still run from it.
When I read that statement from FDA to Pfizer it stated Comirnaty was approved FOR MANUFACTURE. In other words its OK to make it but NOT approved for human use.
How many of you here posted it was approved?
PS That was the very day the FDA hot-shot quit and went to Pfizer.
Attention to detail is an admirable trait in a human being....