I sense that White Hats are working hard at present to simulate internal division, part of which requires a varied narrative. When a missile locks onto target, a plane (or ship) may send out decoys (shrapnel, flares etc.) to distract the incoming threat, so it ends up destroying itself.

There is value in being unpredictable. Just ask AOC. It increases the difficulty of "locking onto target." Consider recent squabbles that do not appear to make a lot of sense:

1. Lin Wood vs. Gen. Flynn
2. Lin vs. Kyle
3. Trump on the vax (while this is likely multi-dimensional it plays here as well)
4. Lin vs. MTG (a "communist" no less!)
5. Now Cruz comes out and claims to support the "police" re. J6. (My guess is he is setting the stage for his next confrontation with the real coup-man AG Garland).

There are many more potential examples out there. However, the point is that all of these makes it increasingly difficult for the enemy to pin us down. When there is NO variation among White Hats, it is very easy for the MSM to pin a narrative. Being one-dimensional while employing a monotone is a likely death sentence in politics (unless of course you are a Liberal and get the full support of evil).

Trump employed this strategy frequently in the WH. He would bring in individuals just to generate controversy, fire them, and use the attention created to deflect against potentially more damaging incoming attacks. Similar to controlled opposition (Alex Jones & the Radical Left), the effect is to achieve a degree of control over the incoming attack, where before there was none.