Late last week the Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the Covid mandates.
AFLDS filed a “friend of the Court” brief that provided robust research and hard data to the Solicitor Generals and the Justices.
From their arguments it's obvious that they didn't read it.
We were disheartened to hear the Supreme Court Justices ask such factually inaccurate questions and the Solicitor Generals not inform the Justices of the science.
While surprising, we take it as a lesson and will adjust our approach.
It was shocking to hear Justice Sotomayor make patently false statements regarding infection rates and severity. In addition to obviously not reading the submitted brief, it appears that she has also never read the Constitution. Our Bill of Rights guarantees individual’s human liberty - whereas she literally compared a human being to a machine.
Her words were so disturbing that the internet and mainstream media exploded with criticism of her.
Together we are turning the tide of awareness. AFLDS is providing people with the accurate information they are not getting elsewhere.
Together we are providing people in need with safe, effective, alternative treatment options.
Thank you for your continued support.
Is there a link to this statement? I couldn't find it on their website and would like to send the original to several people.
Here's the closest I could find as this statement was made in the Patriot Post emails I get.
https://aflds.org/news/press-releases/aflds-files-an-amicus-brief-to-the-us-supreme-court-to-appeal-the-sixth-circuits-decision-dissolving-the-stay-of-the-osha-mandate/
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/files/aflds-amicus-brief-in-support-of-emergency-applications-for-osha-ets-cases/
Thank you so much. You didn't have to go to all that trouble. I'm sure at some point it will show up on their press release page. Thanks again.
I will look but I'm signed up to receive emails directly from them and this was an email.
Okay, never mind. Thanks. This is a very powerful statement.
The SC is deliberately acting obtuse, as instructed by their handlers. When they rule in support of Biden's mandates and OSHA enforcement, they can then pretend their decision was due to lack of credible knowledge.
Why would the Justices allow this… something is off. Sotomayer… what’s the long standing law on how to remove unsavory Justices from the bench? I smell a set-up and it seems Sotomayer might just be the target. SCJustices don’t face civilian charges. The only way to prosecute them is by military tribunal. Is this the beginning stages of stain removal at the SC? That’s what it seems like to me. Just my simple line of free thought…
Thank you, Frontline Doctors, for all of your efforts to inform everyone of the medical truth. We love you!
That judge is very stupid or very corrupt. No other explanation.
They trying to soften us up for the L to come? Most of the mainstream reports are looking BAD for the OSHA mandate, hmm
Is there any inkling as to when the decision will be coming down?
Not that I've heard. So far lamestream media seems to think they will do a split mandate and leave the Healthcare in place but strike OSHA. BUT idk