It’s just too... scripted I mean why put the architect out front?
Why focus the entire world’s 👀 on the lynchpin of the whole enterprise? Is it personal hubris? Perhaps, Did Anal Swab coerce or install him into the spot-light to so his inevitable destruction will pacify the masses? The pre-cast fall-guy?
Did the White hats allow his ascendency to cast light on the whole sick underbelly of the military/media/pharma/government complex?
It’s just so convenient, that the mouthpiece of the DS is the one who is revealing them to the masses.
It really is a movie, and the cast-director is spoon-feeding us the plot.
“The Sickle”? “Anal swab”? Sometimes it is annoying to me when some of us use their pet names to try and detail out a narrative. It takes away from the ability to carry on a legitimate dialogue and makes us all seem very slanted in our perception of things. It makes it really easy for outsiders to paste us as whackos and conspiracy theorists.
I get it that “Fauci” means “the sickle” and that you are trying to make your movie point, but “anal swab”???? WTF? Downvote me if you want to but this continually drives me crazy. Just say the name of the person you are trying to describe so you don’t look like you are immediately biased (with the exception of “no name”, I get that one and the rationale behind it).
Very sorry to offend you. I don’t feel Klaus Schwab deserves respect or consideration. But to clarify, I am biased. Extremely passionately biased. That’s why I’m here. That’s why most of us are here. If you have been here longer than 5 minutes, I suppose those “esoteric” references wouldn’t be lost on you. Are you equally baffled by the myriad references to the numbers 17 and 33 that seem to permeate this site?
You didn’t offend me, it just seems annoying and takes away from legitimate points. Good to know “anal swab” is your reference to Klaus. The only thing I was coming up with was Adam Schiff (“AS”).
Obviously I was not the only one to be lost on your point as others have said as much.
With that being said, I agree with you. Some of the references, coincidences and blatant “in-your-face” actions make it really hard not to think that much of what is happening is scripted.
No, I am not equally baffled by most references, but it is because I have been on this ride for a long time. I was red pilled early in my life and have been watching all of this stuff play out in real time. Granted, I was watching Q posts as they came out and was riding along as fellow anons were working together to help research the points that Q referenced and questions asked. All along the time of Q posts, I thought to myself how glad I was to be around while anons were working through the research. I continually thought that it would almost be impossible to know what Q was referencing without the help of anon dialogues to help decipher answers.
Thanks Fren. Appreciate the thoughtful response. I can take conservative criticism. Fight the good fight, & navigate nimbly.