Can someone who understands such things explain this to me. Sounds like it can actually go back to the 6th and be reversed?
"The applications for stays presented to JUSTICE KAVANAUGH and by him referred to the Court are granted. OSHA’s COVID–19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard, 86 Fed. Reg. 61402, is stayed pending disposition of the applicants’ petitions for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and disposition of the applicants’ petitions for writs of certiorari, if such writs are timely sought. Should the petitions for writs of certiorari be denied, this order shall terminate automatically. In the event the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the order shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.
If I remember this was a ruling on if the mandate can go into effect while it lends trial.
So this ruling says the mandate is on hold until it makes it through the other court case
My worry is a lot of bootlicking businesses will press forward anyway under the framework Biden gave them
My company said last week they were going to follow the SC ruling. Because they are only implementing if it is OSHA regulated.
This is a nation wide corporation
I think some businesses are being bribed to enforce mandate. Do they really want to give up government money? No. That's when the suin' comes. They will lose either way.
So it might come back despite being found unconstitutional by the supremes??
That’s where I am confused, because if a lower court passes the mandate then it would be appealed to the SC, who already showed how they would rule.
🤷♂️ I just listen to X22
So the "other court case" can find that it can go ahead?