I modified the questions from https://greatawakening.win/p/13zMZUJALE/15-pages-of-questions-to-ask-you/

-- (I originally sent this to Home Depot)

My son came home with a paper stating that you will start discriminating against those who have decided not to participate in an experimental vaccine trial (for sickness with a 99.94% survival rate). For one, we already had covid, so injecting ourselves with a "vaccine" that programs your body to produce the spike protein that we are now naturally vaccinated against is what will cause antibody-dependent enhancement where your body will, quite literally, fight against itself.

After taking the vaccine, we know at least eight people who have died and many people who have mysterious illnesses. Our aunt has tremors like Parkinson's' Disease, and our pastor has Bell's Palsey. My father had emergency blood clot surgery a couple of days after his shot. My mother has a strange lump on her abdomen. My grandmother has dementia, just to name a few. Half of those who died "of covid" were 100% healthy. Everyone I know who has died "from Covid" was people who have taken these so-called Vaccines. Everyone else we know who is 'unvaccinated' and had Covid survived.

Please answer these questions for me.

1: When does Carhartt anticipate that the FDA-approved Comirnaty will be available in the United States?

2: Is Carhartt aware that Pfizer, Moderna, and Jansen are only authorized under Emergency Use Authorization (Not FDA approved)? Only Comirnaty has FDA approval, but it is not available in the United States. The FDA found Comirnaty was a legally distinct product and not the same as the Pfizer vaccine. Does this mean these pharmaceutical companies still have immunity from liability for adverse reactions?

3: Is Carhartt willing to wait until phase 3 testing is complete so its employees can access the necessary data and analysis to make an informed decision on these vaccines?

NPR reported that both Pfizer and Moderna tainted their phase II studies by contacting the placebo groups and advising the participants that they had taken a placebo. In light of this revelation, does Carhartt still trust any results published by these entities from their phase II studies?

4: The CDC, the FDA, and the White House recently announced that they would not require the vaccines for its employees. Because the CDC and its employees have intimate knowledge of any short-comings or adverse events associated with the vaccines, and because the CDC was recently sued in federal court in Alabama citing a whistleblower who stated that the CDC is hiding 45,000 or more deaths from the VAERS system, is Carhartt willing wait to see if the allegations in the federal lawsuit can be substantiated?

5: Recent studies have shown that people who contracted Covid and acquired natural immunity are 1300% more protected than those who received vaccines. If employees subjected themselves to antibody tests or T-Cell tests and proved they had natural immunity, would Carhartt waive any vaccine requirements? If not, why not?

6: Recent data also shows that adverse vaccine effects occur 2-4x more often in those with natural immunity. If Carhartt has any studies to the contrary, please provide those to employees for review.

7: What is Carhartt's response to employees' concerns who have had family members take vaccines and have suffered severe adverse effects?

8: On Wednesday, July 21, 2021, the CDC initiated a Phase I recall of the use of PCR testing. The PCR tests were unreliable and reported a high number of false positives, and failed to distinguish between Covid and the flu. Is Carhartt currently using PCR tests? If so, what is the cycle threshold of the PCR test used by Carhartt to determine if a patient or employee is Covid positive? When does Carhartt plan to phase out PCR tests? What does Carhartt intend to use as a replacement for PCR testing?

9: The Director of the CDC, Rochelle Walinsky, recently admitted in a CNN interview by Wolfe Blitzer that the vaccines do not prevent Covid 19, nor does it stop the vaccinated person from transmitting the infection. The only benefit touted is a reduction in symptoms for the vaccinated person. If Ms. Walinsky and the CDC are correct, there can be no benefit to any party other than the vaccinated person. If this is the case, why would Carhartt have any interest in the vaccine status of its employees?

10: Would Carhartt be willing to assign doctors to staff who get vaccinated to ensure proper monitoring and testing for adverse events that occur after vaccination?

11: Would those doctors assigned to monitor Carhartt employees who have vaccinated issue D-Dimer tests within ten days of vaccination of its employees to check for blood clots? It is worth noting that Dr. Hoffe (in Canada) performed D-Dimer tests in his vaccinated patients and found that over 60% of them had blood clotting issues.

12: OSHA recently revised its rulings to allow employees mandated to get vaccinated as part of their employment to sue their employers for any adverse reactions. In light of this ruling:

Does Carhartt's employee health insurance plan provide complete coverage should an employee experience an adverse event, or even death?

13: Does Carhartt's life insurance policy provide any coverage if an employee dies from receiving a EUA Covid-19 injection?

14: Will Carhartt be providing Workers' Compensation, disability insurance, or other resources if an employee has an adverse event to a EUA Covid-19 injection and cannot come to work for days, weeks, or months, or is disabled for life?

15: The pharmaceutical companies lobbied and contracted for complete immunity if a vaccine causes injury or death. The vaccines available to the public at this time are still under EUA (not FDA approved) and, accordingly, still provide immunity to the producers of these vaccines. Anyone injured by these vaccines has no financial recourse. If an employee of Carhartt suffers injury due to an adverse reaction to a work-mandated vaccine, will Carhartt waive its defense of assumption of risk in any litigation involving such injury? Or, will Carhartt insist that its employees should have known the dangers in getting a vaccine under emergency use authorization?

16: As Carhartt is aware, Congress granted immunity to manufacturers of the vaccines currently under Emergency Use Authorization. Because citizens injured by these vaccines have no legal recourse against the manufacturer, will Carhartt agree to help employees injured by these vaccines in any way, either through financial means or through free health care?

17: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that EUA vaccine recipients be provided with certain vaccine-specific information to help them make an informed decision about vaccination. The EUA fact sheets that must be provided are specific to each authorized Covid-19 injection and are developed by the manufacturers of the injections (Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, Oxford/AstraZeneca, and the Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Janssen). The fact sheets must provide the most current and up-to-date information on the injections, and vaccine recipients must also receive information about adverse events. Does Carhartt intend to provide its employees with these fact sheets and current information on adverse events if you require vaccinations?

18: Is Carhartt clinical leadership actively monitoring the available databases of material adverse events reported to date for people who have received Covid-19 vaccine injections (VAERS and others)? Potential and reported adverse events include death, anaphylaxis, neurological disorders, autoimmune disorders, other long-term chronic diseases, blindness and deafness, infertility, fetal damage, blood clots, myocarditis, miscarriage, and stillbirth. What is the threshold in reported cases for each following before Carhartt would stop advising its employees to take the vaccines?

Death ______ Anaphylaxis ______ Neurological Disorders ______ Miscarriages ______

19: The FDA's guidance on emergency use authorization of medical products requires the FDA to "ensure that recipients are informed to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances... [t]hat they have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product...." Will this option be available to employees of Carhartt?

20: The Americans with Disabilities Act provides three legally protected avenues to employees who seek to refuse vaccines. Those avenues include medical exemptions, religious exemptions, and conscientious objections. Will Carhartt allow for these three exemptions if it chooses to require vaccines, and will Carhartt provide a copy of your policy on these allowed exemptions?

21: Concerning the emergency use of an unapproved product, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Title 21 USC 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III) reiterate that individuals be informed of "the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, [and] of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that is available and of their benefits and risks." Please provide the written policy of Carhartt that would explain its authority to mandate vaccines that are still under a EUA in light of the above-referenced act.

22: Under the Nuremberg Code—the foundation of ethical medicine—no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. The individual's consent is essential. No court has ever upheld a federal mandate for a EUA vaccine. In Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F. Supp. 2d 119 (2003), a federal court held that the US military could not mandate EUA vaccines for soldiers: "...[T]he United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs" (Id. at 135). If Carhartt intends to deviate from the principles established in the Nuremberg Code and Rumsfeld, will it provide a copy of its policy that justifies this deviation?

23: Since the Covid lockdowns began over one year ago, over 178 reported breaches of unsecured protected health information (PHI), incidents investigated by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR). These breaches exposed millions of people's personal health information. Some of the breaches to PHI fell directly under the 1996 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), such as sharing a patent's or person's information with an unauthorized individual or incorrectly handling PHI. Can you please explain Carhartt's obligations to its employees, under HIPAA law, and how you will protect their personal information? Has Carhartt requested vaccination status from the state reporting agency, and what if any, information have they provided Carhartt?

24: Article 3.2 (Human Dignity and Human Rights) of the United Nations Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights states: "The interest and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society" see https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000146180

We have heard several statements (written and spoken) by our leadership implying that societal needs outweigh the individual's rights. In light of these statements conflicting with Art 3.2 listed above, is Carhartt's current position on bioethics consistent with Article 3.2? Can you provide a written policy to the employees of Carhartt explaining any deviation from this bioethical principle?

25: Continuing with the United Nations Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, Article 6.1 (Consent) of the declaration states: "Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice."