Always post sauce. You posted a picture from an anonymous forum full of shitposters. That post had no sauce and could easily have been generated on any PC on the planet and shopped around as if it were legit.

The accusation is explosive: that the US deliberately engineered and released this bioweapon. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If such proof exists, I want to see it for myself in context. If this document is legitimate and unclassified, it would constitute an admission of guilt that the Trump administration built this thing. Of course, it'd be helpful to have the context, because the context is that Fauci and NIAID had funded 6 years' of work through Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance to be done by Dr. Shi Xhengli (the "bat lady"), and before that, she'd been getting different grants via UNC to do the same thing under Hussein's corrupt administration.

Now, if DARPA was also looped in on all of this, that's critical to understand. DARPA is DoD, not civilian. And we're bound by international treaty from developing bioweapons. If this is NIAID, that's one thing. If it's DARPA, then discontinued by DOD and picked up by Fauci, that's a different thing and a whole different set of people need to be facing firing squads. That's how explosive this potentially is.

We're dealing in a world full of straight up BS, misinformation, disinformation, and people with a dozen different angles and personal motives all lying to try and spin crap to their advantage. We've got salty veterans from the early days of Q mixed right in with newbies who are just waking up to the idea that their entire world view is a lie. If you have to sort that out and try to discern truth for yourself, you need actual data. You need real, tangible proof that you can look at and evaluate with your own two eyes without some talking head or Paytriot filtering it.

So sauce it, and sauce it properly.

So I follow LoneWulf's sauce to a no-name blog that looks like a Wix template to a post by a guy who calls himself "Moose Knuckle" (which exudes class and professionalism) who's reposting work from Jennifer Van Laar at RedState.com (part of a network of conservative blogs with a moderate anti-Trump bias). I read her work and she references the real sauce: Project Veritas's reporting, which itself has its own reputation and biases. The links to copies of the document are hosted on a PV-owned server, and we have to trust they're genuine because O'Keefe staked his reputation and his neck on their authenticity.

The real sauce:

https://www.projectveritas.com/news/military-documents-about-gain-of-function-contradict-fauci-testimony-under/