The LSAT means nothing. It doesn't assess anything other than a person's fitness to attend law school and pass. Same as the MCAT and doctors. I don't care how good a doctor's MCAT score is. I care if they're a competent doctor and if they have a decent bedside manner so I feel like I being cared for and not simply supplying a revenue stream. When I hire a lawyer, I don't care what their LSAT was. I care that they're a competent attorney who is willing and able to passionately make my case to a court.
I know Tucker put that out there and wants to fight that battle. It's stupid. The test doesn't assess what we want to know which is: will she adjudicate according to the Constitution, or is she going to legislate from the bench?
I hate the left for producing this “judge”.
I hate Harvard for accepting her. I really want to see those LSAT scores.
The LSAT means nothing. It doesn't assess anything other than a person's fitness to attend law school and pass. Same as the MCAT and doctors. I don't care how good a doctor's MCAT score is. I care if they're a competent doctor and if they have a decent bedside manner so I feel like I being cared for and not simply supplying a revenue stream. When I hire a lawyer, I don't care what their LSAT was. I care that they're a competent attorney who is willing and able to passionately make my case to a court.
I know Tucker put that out there and wants to fight that battle. It's stupid. The test doesn't assess what we want to know which is: will she adjudicate according to the Constitution, or is she going to legislate from the bench?
The LSAT means more than you think.
No, she didn’t need to ace it. But I’d like to see her scores in relation to her class.