I appreciate the skepticism in this substack, although the arguments fall flat imho. It's one thing to point out Dr. Ardis isn't credentialed (although this criticism is simply that the man is a chiropractor, which isn't a great argument; chiropractors are often more well-rounded and knowledgeable than regular MDs, who typically undergo heavy Rockefeller, big pharma propaganda in their training), but it's another thing to base all criticism on the fact that snake venom is well documented and highly researched.

Dr. Ardis brought up some very strange correlations/coincidences and I think he deserves to be well and truly questioned over the science on which he bases his conclusions.

I haven't watched yet, but this 3-part series with Mike Adams is apparently a really good discussion about Dr. Ardis' claims.