So this board knows that intel is clearly involved in likely every aspect of our lives now. There are whole books on the topics, but I would like to focus on one small aspect of intel that we can reasonably deduce a few things from: assets

So in a most basic, oversimplified sense, an asset is simply that, an asset, used by the IC or similar groups to gather info or exert influence. They can go by other names such as agent, but we'll stick with the broad term here for simplicity.

These usually come in a few varieties:

• willfully complicit - "I share your cause, please let me help!"
• opportunistic/mercenary - "How much are you paying?"
• coerced/blackmail - "Don't make the photos public; don't 'suicide' my family!"
• unwitting - "That helped their agenda? No way! I just wanted x"

If we look at Congress for example, it's very likely that many forces want to exert control over each member of both houses. Let's play pretend here and ask ourselves "what does that actually involve on a day-to-day basis?"

First, a puppet-master wants to confidently know who they have on "strings" for obvious reasons. The problem with all assets is that they also have to keep up appearances. RINOs often will try to save face and pretend they care about something, but when the rubber meets the road, they're suddenly voting like Democrats, right? Simple, low-hanging example.

This process results in a very tenuous relationship between owners and puppets because it can be very hard to know how many hands are up the puppets posterior and which one ultimately has control. Imagine a chess game where your knight decides to move in a different direction than you wanted on your turn. Infuriating, right?

So what's my point? If you're an asset with multiple masters barking at you to work and all of them are ultimately coercive in nature, how do you keep your head on straight? You play to all of them at one point or another. This means getting your hands dirty.

If Crenshaw comes out tomorrow and starts being a pure constitutionalist (1A and 2A absolutist, for example). What do you think the Cabal would do? They'd know they lost control and see him as a "rogue asset" who needs to be brought back on the plantation or "handled" accordingly.

What does this mean in practical terms? If we're seeing assets flip black > white, we're going to see what looks like "relapses" of their behavior. They have to keep their old owners strung along or else they will face dire consequences. Unfortunately, this will be almost indistinguishable from grifting or similar behavior to the public (us). Ironically, are they grifting us or the puppet-masters now?

Does this necessarily excuse these politicians selling us out? No, but it does provide an explanation for the apparent lack of legislative progress. In a way, the gridlock suggests we ARE seeing assets flip and there's a power struggle going on that likely transcends the MAGA/Dem+RINO paradigm.

Additionally, when you remember that many of these people are not necessarily into the nasty stuff like Epstein's island, they could just be worried about their families. There are layers and differences in many ways. Sure, the higher up you go the more corrupt they likely are, but of the nearly 600 people in Congress how many do you actually hear about on a day-to-day basis? Many are very likely well-meaning people who unknowingly got caught up in the DC meat grinder. The reason they don't make the news like Swalwell or Crenshaw is because they haven't sold their souls, so to speak, but they play ball when it comes to voting certain ways. The Cabal would get what they want anyways, and the lawmaker and their loved ones avoid the cruelty they would incur.

I know this can be very frustrating, but we need to remember that telling people to look their young children in the eye and go "well I wanted to keep you safe, but my personal sense of virtue is more important than your well-being" is incredibly twisted. What we should be doing is finding ways to support leaders who legit break away from the machine. Once that ball starts rolling in the form of meaningful results, we'll know the wind is at our backs.

TL;DR: Assets have to keep up appearances after they flip (in any direction). Don't assume anyone in politics is going to appear "pure" unless they're relatively new like MTG or Youngkin.