100 years ago, a Senator or Congressman would be charged with treason for attempting to destroy the Bill of Rights because it Was treason. IT STILL IS.
Indeed. Talk of passing legislation with intent to subvert the constitution by those who have sworn an oath to uphold the constitution, is technically sedition, in my opinion, and should legally be treated as such.
Those people are flagrantly violating their oath of office- committing a crime; and for the goal of nullifying our constitutional safeguards found within the Bill of Rights.
100 years ago, a Senator or Congressman would be charged with treason for attempting to destroy the Bill of Rights because it Was treason. IT STILL IS.
Indeed. Talk of passing legislation with intent to subvert the constitution by those who have sworn an oath to uphold the constitution, is technically sedition, in my opinion, and should legally be treated as such.
Those people are flagrantly violating their oath of office- committing a crime; and for the goal of nullifying our constitutional safeguards found within the Bill of Rights.