Popcorn time, folks. I was initially upset at the verdict, but now that it finally clicked I'm laughing because this is gonna get good.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Yes they can. It's possible to know Sussman lied and they still run with it anyways.
I think materiality requires the FBI to have acted on the lie because they believed it though. If that's true, then in fact a conviction would have required an "If the FBI believes it."
How do you know Sussman lied? The only evidence we have to that fact is Baker's testimony.
So what you are saying essentially is that if an FBI official says you did something, than you fucking did it.... no other questions needed...
is that what your saying?
How do we know he lied? How about the fact the last piece of evidence Durham presented to the jury was sworn testimony from a congressional hearing where Sussman said he was working for the Clinton campaign? Under oath.
The FBI knew he was working for the Clinton campaign. They were having constant meetings with the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
This was not an unknown fact by any of the FBI investigators that worked on case.
The lie was created to prevent the investigation from never opening or being delayed until after the election.
Do you think Sussman, who is friends with Baker, create this big lie and tricked his friend into thinking all this was a big fucking coincidence that it is against Trump?
no.. that is not what happened... Baker is not that stupid, he was in on it with Sussman. The proposed lie was actually all fabricated evidence to skate FBI rules and give them plausible deniability.