Now that Q is back, I’d assume that the “first arrest will verify action and confirm direction” mentioned previously has probably happened. Was it Pelosi?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
wrong pelosi. if nasty then maybe not the drunk husband.
But think about it. As bad as a DUI is, in the grand scheme of the things it’s still technically a misdemeanor in most states and something that powerful people should be able to flick away with ease. I’ve always assumed that the celebrities and politicians that actually got charged with them or wound up in the news because of it were either being taught a lesson by their handlers or they were in the process of being given a swift kick in the ass on the way out of their club.
That said, Pelosi is the top of their shitty heap. If she can’t speak away this issue then maybe that’s the proof that the well is running dry. Just a thought, obviously could be anyone but I don’t think Q meant it to be like a fireworks display to kick off the end of this. Up until now everything else has been under the radar and methodical.
Good points but the tiktok crowd have no idea who pp is. Not going to wake up a normie. they probably have no idea who nasty is.
That’s what I think has gotten lost in translation over the years with that post. The first arrest wasn’t supposed to shock people or wake up anyone, it was a mile marker in the plan, “to verify action and confirm direction”. I’m still not sure why it got turned into, “the first arrest will shock everyone”