When I say commies, I refer to the Deep State basically. Communism is the closest label to them but they can also be called Fascists or tyrants. All the same thing.

Ok, so I will describe the word trickery game.

Long ago, Rothschild ran a Q&A called "I am Rofschild. Axe me a question". He mentioned that "those pesky" Egyptians created labels for everything. Before these labels (or names) people simply new what stuff was instinctively. I was trying to figure out what he meant for a long time. I knew he was referring to the Egyptian Cult who controls the Western Part of the Deep State mostly even today. They call themselves the "Great White Brotherhood" not because they are White though.

So when People go to Court, the Courts use the "Black's Law Dictionairy" which officially defines stuff. Although this is useful in some ways, it is also easily and often weaponized against the People.

For example, if someone uninvited goes into another person's property, the property owner can shoot him. So let's say a corrupt and powerful individual shoots someone who was walking home and had 1 foot on the front lawn of that person's property. He can rig the court system to let him go free because he can say that man was not invited to his house. We all know this is bullshit because he was walking home. He didn't mean to put part of his foot on the grass but the there was no sidewalk and he didn't want to walk into the street. However, since the law uses words to describe the law that the man cannot walk on private property, they can use that to forgive the shooter. The shooter may have shot that guy because he doesn't like him and he may be powerful enough to get away with it. You can see how the definition of words are used to argue in favor of the Deep State power holder.

Another example is that a man might be asked how much he bought an item for and he says: $1050. In fact, he bought it for $1060 but he didn't remember so he said $1050. This can be used by the court to call him a liar and if he is a liar, the court can use that definition of liar to discount all that the person ever mentioned in the court case which would work against him. Technically he isn't a liar. He made a human error.

Another example is that a man drove 26 on a 25 max speed limit. Technically he can be punished by a ticket since he drove over the speed limit.

Another example is that we can say we want to run a Democracy in this area of the World and then they can open up the Dictionary and say: "This is exactly how we have to do it by the dictionary". This is silly because there are thousands of different types of ways to run a democracy. It's never 1 set way nor does it have to be and altering it from what it says in the dictionary doesn't make it something else. Democracy is a general idea of a country run by the People. That's it. How those People do it from there varies in thousands of ways.

The way the Commies are abusing this word system is mostly in courts or in Police Statements. What they do is take a person's testimony, twist up the words in a thousand ways to alter the meaning and then they punish the poor chap when he didn't even do anything wrong.

Another way is to play all kinds of word games in contracts. Those contracts are written in a different language called "legalese" which only lawyers understand so that when you sign it, you don't realize it is full of pitfalls for you. This is why it is best to never sign anything. For example, they write your name in all CAPS like that and claim you signing the contract means that you consent to being a Corporation. You say "I don't even have a corporation" and they say "Yes you do, it's your birth certificate and since you signed this contract with your name in all caps, you agreed to it." Obviously you never agreed to any such thing and the contract was deceptive and so it is null and void due to the deception. Plus most contracts are frivolous and don't hold weight. Only the founding Father paperwork (ie Constitution) holds weight. The Commies even try to say that the Declaration Of Independence isn't a legal document because the definition of a legal document is (enter bullshit here). They claim that we have a Right to abolish Gov isn't law because it's written on the Declaration Of Independence and (enter bullshit here). Either way, abolishing a tyrannical Government is legal under Natural Law just as fighting off a thief is Naturally legal.

One last thing, they make those contracts extremely long and confusing because they know you don't have time to read it and then they put pitfalls into them.

These fuckers play stupid ass word games like this all the time. For now I recommend:

Don't sign shit. Don't talk to anyone in law enforcement even for small stuff. Just ignore them.

Ultimately, true intention is what we agree to now so if you go to a job and agree to work there and 2 weeks later, you believe you are being abused by that Corporation, you can walk off because you don't agree anymore. If you enter a contract with someone and see that they are abusing you in sneaky ways, you can cancel the contract. They can't really do anything anyway since Contracts don't hold that much weight to be honest.

Also, no contract can take away your Human Rights even if you agree to give them away for food and shelter or whatever. This is because Rights are inalienable. They cannot be removed from you.

Please learn this stuff well because when devilish lawyers or law enforcement try to fuck you over, you are mentally prepared to fight back in this psychological war aka Spiritual War.