Bug eyed/drug eyed biden doesn't make any sense if we are talking about deepfakes. Take a look at this latest unreal engine test/demo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSmN7aXSd5Y
Unreal engine is a game engine which is used to create game's. The above link is a realistic animated face (watch till the end!).
If a game engine can do this, what do you think the deep-state can use technology wise??? They could render something truely realistic in stead of that ...that...that pcp-injected-drug-face.
It doesn't make any sense...It's just all weird.
Unless they actually drugged him up, but could that make his face so different?
You don't need Unreal to generate a deepfake if a deep learning AI (uh, not really true AI, it's just a good pattern mimic) network is used with images/video.
A deep learning AI deepfake would account for the bug eyes. If the AI is trained using regular videos, there would be rather little eye pixels to train the AI with. I doubt there is enough info to train the AI properly for the eyes, and you need to take into account lighting reflections and coordinated movement. An AI would not have instrinsic knowledge of the need for coordinated eye movement, so it may not mimic things very well.
Humans are very sensitive to the eye abnormalities -- any imperfections would show up. If forced to bet, I would put my money on it being a full or partial deepfake. Or even a double in a CIA rubber mask, improved in post-processing using deepfake AI.
I think Joe's handlers are pulling our legs, deliberately messing it up a bit to see who is really paying attention.
Unreal was just meant as an example where the software is (or will be) made available for the public.
Just wanted to point out that whoever is controlling biden could have access to more advanced rendering tech unbeknown to us.
AI is a "scary" thing I have seen (heard) some examples what can be done. For example human like voices, I don't mean those youtube ones. Voices with adapt to the content it reads and becomes so lively it fooled a lot of people. Or when creating music or when mastering music. And that's just the audio category. And in the image editing category I have seen some crazy crazy stuff.
I am just trying to say... "this is available for the public" ... now try to imagine what they have access to.
I stopped being stuck on the uncanny valley I think that has been "solved" but not made publicly. But I need to keep an open mind and this is all just IMHO.
Yeah, no biggie. We're just trying to emphasize different things.
SIGGRAPH demos are often really cool. And that's just publishable research.
But that last part of Joe's vid made so many of us go, WTF?! They could have done a much better fake. But they didn't. Wanted them goggle eyes. That's gotta be deliberate.
Well, it's a movie and I gotta get my popcorn!