Lincoln "suspended" the right of Habeas Corpus for the U.S. Citizens and also pretended to have authority to suspend The Constitution of the United States of America and replaced it with the Lieber Code.
Both these offenses have (mis) guided the operations of the U.S. Military and the British Territorial United States Government ever since, as they have mistaken Lincoln as the President of our Federation of States --- an office that he never in fact held.
He was "a" President, but not "the" President. He was foreclosed from holding the actual Federation office of The President of The United States of America and he was also prohibited from holding the office of The President of The United States (the presidency of our Federal Republic) by the Titles of Nobility Amendment (1819) prohibiting attorneys from holding any office in our government.
Thus, Lincoln himself was a cuckoo bird --- a British fakir, pretending to have authorities he didn't have and pretending to occupy an office that he didn't in fact occupy at all. He was admitted to the Illinois Bar in 1834, and he remained a member of the Bar until his death, so he literally could not be the actual President of this country.
...
Might want to read the Real Lincoln, author Thomas J. DiLorenzo
I sent this to Anna as well
Remember Lincoln was a Attorney, he created a new colorable overlay 13 amendment in his colorable constitution, the original 13 amendment outlawed Attorneys in Government... Why? They were setting it up Because in 1872 they brought in the Colorable law system of Rome, first in NY they adopted the Roman Civil Law, Civil Procedure, Penal and Political code's now called Government code, California followed and adopted same, then the rest of the states. Two Brothers pushed this crap, one was David Dudley Field NY.his bro was in CA. The State legislatures screwed us! Then the rest of the states followed. Tada the lawyers took over our country. could not have done it without the "Civil War" setup.
Our original law was pure Common law, The Writs, now we've had two colorable overlays, 1872 Roman Civil Law. then after the federal reserve bankruptcy caused by the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. 20 years later they bankrupted, outlawed the people trading in GOLD which caused them to bring in the UCC the Uniform Commercial code also called the negotiable instrument law which by 1964 all states had adopted, thus the second colorable overlay of Law administered by the Attorneys on behalf of the UK as a vassal of the Crown Vatican. Why the UCC which is also called Law merchant, because they traded in paper securities receipts not gold and they made it so you, we the people could not demand species in the contracts from that point forward. No contracts could demand Gold as payment, no substance. The writs were so simple, the who, did what, when, where and how you were injured and the damages sought. either the respondent failed to reply, or replied and now a trial by jury of your peers. You could not appeal the Common law Jury decision. The founding fathers had the option of adopting the Roman Civil law system but deliberately did not as they wanted no part of Roman civil law and the Attorneys eating out our substance that administer it.
Now you have ever single administrative agency has a attorney and gobs as "representatives" in Government County State and Federal eating out your substance for our lack of knowledge.
On the federal courts website they still show a diagram of the common law court room. the petitioners face the Common law jury... the judge is on the left as he only had a ministerial duty. By the way the original 13 amendment was never removed it was just covered up. When you look at the history you can see them setting all this crap up step by step. Franklin said its a republican form of government if you can keep it. We didn't, that's why you hear them call it a democracy because they colorable overlayed it with a socialist democracy, the history proves it. The Great Awakening cannot start until all this is understood. IMHO Common Law is still sitting there unused. I love Granny Anna!
The way I see it, human history has been so warped, twisted and fabricated to the point that personalities and incidents of the distant past are nothing more than tools that are used to serve the current and future needs.
Knowing how things in the past really turned out is important for those that pursue the truth. For the masses, as long as these figures can be used to relay your message to them and to get them to feel the way you want them to feel, be it patriotism or something else, then they serve their purpose as useful tools to get things done. Most people would never bother to dig in deeper than what they were told by the general public. It's mostly just using current public knowledge (or lack thereof) and beliefs to minimize the friction of delivering a message.
Are the details irrelevant? Of course not. For the people that need to know, learning the truth about history is vital and should be pursued. Now trying to get the general public to spend what little mental capacity they have available (due to misinformation, being distracted, focused on survival and just want the noise to go away, etc) to learn about it and accept it might not be the most productive course of action in the short-term. If you can use historic figures to sway hearts and minds, regardless of their actual human character, then I think it's fine for now.
For the long term, things like these should most likely be part of education and detailed knowledge about the past is probably something that future generations of normies can benefit from.
Again, I'm not saying people shouldn't know things like this and that the knowledge shouldn't be shared, but if 'Honest Abe' can help change some minds for the better in a few speeches, then it's fine with me for now.
Wow, sounds familure
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
I had read that this was one of the main grievances the South had against Lincoln: that he had a British title (esquire) and was therefore disqualified from the office of President. Now there are British agents (BAR members) and foreign nationals (with dual citizenship) all over our government. There is so much license and freedom in our government structure that we have to be especially vigilant against infiltration. How we can manage to avoid takeovers may require serious study and discussion.
Oh and by the Way Lincoln was not successful with the suspension of the writ of Habeas Corpus Right to face your accuser for long, the courts stated that as long as the "Civil courts" were conducting business it could not be as such an emergency to require the suspension of the Great Writ!