We know Biden has used his slurs/gaffes to send comms and this comment was also "off-script". It's perfect because the gaffe makes headlines so the comm receiver definitely gets the message and doesn't have to watch an entire talk.
Q posts 1230, 1231, 1232 https://qalerts.app/?q=%231230%7C%231231%7C%231232
12+30 = Q Post 42 https://qalerts.app/?q=%2342
Q Post 3012 https://qalerts.app/?q=%233012
Any other suggestions?
You forgot season 12, episode 30 of Forensic Files.
Also, Cops, season 12, episode 30. Have you watched it yet?
Also what about December 30th? 12/30 of every year.
In case you didn't already realize, numerology is bullshit. Any number in time can be attributed to anything anywhere, or any time period. Your brain creates random patterns because it's designed to recognize patterns for survival. That's it, it's nothing deep.
You should read up on comms and how they work. https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/
Oh, a random person's Wordpress blog? That's why you think comms are in everything, because some random guy made a blog?
Did you know that Wordpress blogs are free? And that even you could make one? About anything.
I could make a blog right now about how cows have different flavored milk depending on their black and white blotches. And someone like you would come along, and just believe it, because it's not a "mainstream" article.
You don't think someone on the internet is ever trying to manipulate you? Ever?
I don't really care who says what on which platform. I just read and judge the content itself.
I think most people on the internet are trying to manipulate others. I think there's a small minority of people getting to the truth. You need to watch where people get their funding from, you need to see if their message is consistent and non-contradictory over a period of time....etc.
For example, the mainstream media gets a TON of funding from big pharma, so we need to be very skeptical of their messaging on vaccines. Meanwhile, many wordpress/independent blogs don't get any funding from big pharma so their analysis can be looked at as more impartial.
1.) Blog writers are not impartial, they monetize the blog. And if they want to make a living off of the blog, they will keep posting what attracts the most attention, as long as people buy their merch, crypto coin, or whatever else.
2.) Political writers are not impartial, which should be obvious, because they will cater to their own political beliefs, and their audiences.
The solution, which is taught in school, is to look at every possible writer, journalist, and even media article that exists, and parse the most likely information. This includes challenging one's own confirmation bias. It's a long process to critically research one subject at a time, but it's something I rarely see on this board. Here, I find people just look at two blogs with the same opinion, and go "yep, that's it!" without even a question or critical viewpoint.