Just had the following brain fart: The purpose of the Q movement is to build public support for a changing of the guard. The subsequent result of this is not consequential to the validity of the theory.

We don’t need to know the veracity of the information derived from Q posts to understand that the entire purpose of them is to turn people away from the western powers that be. You would not do this without then making a move to replace them with others.

Perhaps it could be argued that the purpose is to convince people to seek out the truth on their own. But I argue that this is simply the methodology utilized to turn people against western elites. What need would there be to seek out truth on your own if you weren’t supposed to do something with that truth? A frivolous exercise is to upend someone’s entire psychological existence and then have them watch the horror in real time with no options to change it.

This isn’t to debate the merits of various deep dives into common deep state bullshit narratives. Rather, it is to illustrate that this movement exists as a call to action against the status quo. Whether or not it will be successful is also not the point of discussion. Perhaps I will make a follow up post on the various possibilities that exist as consequences of the movement.

Some of the consequences lack sufficient information to gain meaningful insight. A major consideration to all of this is “Who the hell are we getting in place of the perverts we need to get rid of?” Because history tells us things repeatedly. Like the evils of Chang Kai Shek get replaced with Mao. The crimes of the Tsar are replaced with the Bolsheviks. The Shah of Iran is ousted in favor of the Ayatollah. None of which were better than the asshat in charge before. Is there a general getting too big for his britches? Military Coups rarely turn out favorably for the public.

A lot of analysis fails to consider valid reasons to behave as the deep state does. For one, imagine the Soviets utilizing similar techniques to bring us all into becoming satellite states of the USSR? We would obviously want to counter this. And that might mean doing some really filthy shit. Sometimes reality is messy and quite ugly. Is the main complaint just surrounding gratuitous excesses arising as a natural byproduct of the filth industry that might actually have our best interests in mind? These are things that ought to be explored more in depth than I’ve ever seen.

Note: I am not purporting to promote any of the above ideas. Rather, I assume nothing anymore these days that doesn’t lack sufficient substance beyond platitudes and hope behind it. It is a lot easier to convince people when you have gone down all of these trees and reached a supported conclusion on evidence.