I want to prove Q wrong and I want you to join me! - The Great Awakening

I want to prove Q wrong and I want you to join me!

posted 2 years ago by HumblePede 2 years ago by HumblePede +196 / -3

I'll bet that title got your attention. Bear with me...

At this point in the fight, I know most (if not all) of us have suffered strong backlash from those who cannot or will not see what is truly going on in this world. We call these deluded ones sheep, normies, NPCs, or sometimes just plain stupid.

It's difficult to muster up compassion or empathy for those who seem to willfully choose slavery and comfort over freedom and risk. Sometimes the negative reactions and consequences don't seem worth the effort to continually return to the well of self-flagellation when we get nothing but grief for our troubles.

So why bother?!

Here's why. Every single person we rescue from evil's clutches becomes a being of freedom and righteousness, and often they become the most effective warriors for spreading light and love. Who better to convince the seemingly lost of their own enslavement than former slaves?

So how do we prove Q wrong?

Estimated 4-6% we consider ‘hopeless' and forever brainwashed. #337 (12/13/2017)

4-6% LOST FOREVER. #529 (01/13/2018)

4-6% [brainwashed] will never wake up even when presented w/ FACTS. #3029 (03/11/2019)

Between Q's proddings, our own stubbornness, and the honorable service of our meme warriors, we've proven how effective coordinated white hat information warfare is. In the final stages of this battle for good over evil (for that is truly what this is), we know the cabal will lash out with everything they have and we will rise to meet them.

WIN-WIN: Even if we fail to breach the 4-6% of hopeless cases, every single person saved is a victory! No good being left behind.

Therefore, I have made it my personal mission to get well below the oft-mentioned 4-6%. And I hope you will all join me. Honestly, do you think Q would mind if we prove these particular numbers wrong? I'll bet not.

u/#q337

u/#q529

u/#q3029

78 comments

78 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (78)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– ceegeegee 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Part of the issue is DJT is a polarizing figure. Granted, I love the guy, but even I can see there really isn't a middle ground. Many people who resist throw this up as a roadblock and TPTB are more than happy to assist.

The issue then becomes more how do you get people to think beyond that. If someone says 'qanon' is a bunch of right wing radicals who can't handle that Trump lost!', what I am trying to think of is a way to respond that is more 'really? What makes you say that?' with the goal of getting them to think about what they are saying rather than just parroting the corporate line about DJT. Because that is their weapon. So how do we foil that?