Circumcision is not genital mutilation. This is the most delusional, extreme, reactionary take on the subject. You get nowhere with people who aren't already vehemently against it by pushing this narrative.
And, yes, if it's good enough for God, it's good enough for me. If God demands it, I obey. Even if no longer required, it doesn't magically become bad just because the requirement is lifted or only applied/applies to Jews.
The Lord Jesus Christ has the divine right to give orders, following Him can not be wrong because He is the pure manifestation of righteousness and goodness.
If a god or any of his mouthpieces wants you to perform genital mutilation on your new born son, do you obey or do you think for yourself?
Circumcision is not genital mutilation. This is the most delusional, extreme, reactionary take on the subject. You get nowhere with people who aren't already vehemently against it by pushing this narrative.
And, yes, if it's good enough for God, it's good enough for me. If God demands it, I obey. Even if no longer required, it doesn't magically become bad just because the requirement is lifted or only applied/applies to Jews.
Why do it if it's not required. There is zero medical reasons.
There are plenty, but the point isn't doing it or not doing it. The point is that characterizing it as mutilation is effectively an attack on God.
The Lord Jesus Christ has the divine right to give orders, following Him can not be wrong because He is the pure manifestation of righteousness and goodness.
Christ didn't give the order for circumcision. God did. Abraham was called a friend by God.