We had 2 donors standing by that were not vaccinated and got all kinds of excuses that it wouldn't be feasible. They finally said if in the rare case she needed blood, they could stop the bleeding long enough for us to donate blood. I find it hard to believe this is not a bigger issue. Catholic Hospital, Catholic Doctor, and the last thing out of his mouth was "The Pope says it's OK!" Any experts out there want to weigh in on the introduction of mRNA blood into an unvaccinated bloodstream?
She did not need the transfusion, but . . .
There is a moderate chance that the separation of whole blood into red cells would remove some of the harmful substances in the vax. Or concentrate them. Who knows? Blood is separated by centrifuge.
Everyone is taught about how O- is universal donor and AB+ is universal receiver. But that applies to the red cells only. The plasma compatibility is approximately opposite of that. You cannot transfuse whole blood unless both the red cells and the plasma are compatible. So these components are separated for better versatility.
Red blood cells do not have a nucleus. So they should not transfer any DNA. Personally, I still wouldn't want red cells from a shot absorber.
I'm not going to trust a guy who works in the snake building.
Thanks for the info, when I hear someone say "Its Safe" I call bullshit, theres always some risk. Anyone that has had surgery know that.