Then you should have resigned instead of certifying a fraud. You are complicit. Had you resigned, refused to certify, or forced them to fire you, you would have made headlines. Instead you chose the quiet way, just like a sheep.
I read somewhere that the laws in AZ, you can certify an election and then later overturn even after one year.
Signing under duress means he is protesting the certification (gave an in) to the fact that they can later turn. I cannot back up what I am saying except for the fact that the x22 report talks about what Kari Lake said.
Then you should have resigned instead of certifying a fraud. You are complicit. Had you resigned, refused to certify, or forced them to fire you, you would have made headlines. Instead you chose the quiet way, just like a sheep.
I read somewhere that the laws in AZ, you can certify an election and then later overturn even after one year.
Signing under duress means he is protesting the certification (gave an in) to the fact that they can later turn. I cannot back up what I am saying except for the fact that the x22 report talks about what Kari Lake said.
Would t that work either way?
Not sure. Just have to wait and see. This one not done.