I’m “skeptical” as well. I’m skeptical of SG the way I’m skeptical of “Dr. Robert Malone”
The clipped and “precise” speech may be merely stylistic, but something about it seems inorganic. Practiced, rehearsed, or “trained.”
I’m a big fan of “clarity of speech ”
But excessive “clarity of speech” feels inorganic, artificial or…trained.
I watched a video of SG with Riccardo Bossi today being facilitated by an Aussie “Bogan” podcaster.
I’ve always intuitively trusted Bossi, but my opinion of him diminished slightly when I sensed the deference he was giving SG.
My take-away was, the Australian people are so fragile and demoralized that they are willing to grasp at whatever “salve” the faceless SG gives them.
SG always refers to some unnamed mentor who is the source of his inside intell.
That seems weird to me. SG says he was medically separated from his “armed forces” experience, so I wonder at the fact that a guy who uses his contacts from an abbreviated military experience as an anonymous source.
As a former MIL guy myself, I cannot imagine any scenario where someone with esoteric knowledge of the US Military, would engage with medically separated recruit, and share with him “secrets.”
I saw that same video with Bossi. I was surprised by it as well. Sometimes people need to grasp anyone with the updates. Bossi was very interested in finding out about trials, indictments and justice. SG talked about all the traitors who have been tried and were executed. That there is lots of doubles. I have heard lots of anons talk or post about people who I believe are dead (JFK formerly junior) that they say are alive. That a lot of traitors are actually doubles, look a likes. Biden for instance. I still have resistance believing all this. Australians have been through hell, I think that they are looking to us for encouragement.
I’m “skeptical” as well. I’m skeptical of SG the way I’m skeptical of “Dr. Robert Malone”
The clipped and “precise” speech may be merely stylistic, but something about it seems inorganic. Practiced, rehearsed, or “trained.”
I’m a big fan of “clarity of speech ”
But excessive “clarity of speech” feels inorganic, artificial or…trained.
I watched a video of SG with Riccardo Bossi today being facilitated by an Aussie “Bogan” podcaster.
I’ve always intuitively trusted Bossi, but my opinion of him diminished slightly when I sensed the deference he was giving SG.
My take-away was, the Australian people are so fragile and demoralized that they are willing to grasp at whatever “salve” the faceless SG gives them.
SG always refers to some unnamed mentor who is the source of his inside intell.
That seems weird to me. SG says he was medically separated from his “armed forces” experience, so I wonder at the fact that a guy who uses his contacts from an abbreviated military experience as an anonymous source.
As a former MIL guy myself, I cannot imagine any scenario where someone with esoteric knowledge of the US Military, would engage with medically separated recruit, and share with him “secrets.”
Mentor feels more like “handler” to me.
I hope I’m wrong.
But my spidey senses tingle with SG.
I saw that same video with Bossi. I was surprised by it as well. Sometimes people need to grasp anyone with the updates. Bossi was very interested in finding out about trials, indictments and justice. SG talked about all the traitors who have been tried and were executed. That there is lots of doubles. I have heard lots of anons talk or post about people who I believe are dead (JFK formerly junior) that they say are alive. That a lot of traitors are actually doubles, look a likes. Biden for instance. I still have resistance believing all this. Australians have been through hell, I think that they are looking to us for encouragement.