Class action lawsuit after those convictions in criminal court?
Dr. McCullough definitely made those criminal charges sound like an easy slam dunk for a good prosecutor. The enemy would go to jail (or possible death penalty in some cases) and the people could get awarded for damages. I like justice. You should too.
Not dooming here; but, I feel that the courts are just too corrupt for this to happen. The enemy is quite brazen, lately... so, a miscarriage of justice is to be reasonably expected by now. Judges were totally "in on" the lockdowns, mandates etc.
But, if what Dr. McCullough says were successfully pursued; could that then "go viral" all over the world and spread to other countries after USA case precedence is set? There is already a lot of talk about "Nuremberg 2.0."
This is all sooooo YUGE that it does require a cooperative international response. Not sure calling it "Nuremberg" would be wise considering how full of shit the history we've been taught about it is. Anyway. Under what authorities? Military? Insert Trump era E.O.'s??? Any day would be nice. I understand timing is important.
No matter what or how these things MUST come to pass. The threats the death CULTure criminal organizations pose to humanity MUST be neutralized. They have already gained too much ground, IMHO.
Well, Q does say class action is a powerful tool... drops 1105, 1103, 1102 and 830... Dr. McCullough makes a very strong argument for criminal charges and I agree with him and you on that... If precedent were set here in the U.S, I believe many countries would follow suit... Of course I believe in justice but like you said, many courts have been corrupted by big money... as for Nuremberg 2.0, that term has been floating around for a year or more. And yes I'm aware of the history... Reiner Fulmecht brought some of these topics up to the ICC at the Hague and was shot down so I don't know if using them would be ideal... Cheers fren
Class action lawsuit after those convictions in criminal court?
Dr. McCullough definitely made those criminal charges sound like an easy slam dunk for a good prosecutor. The enemy would go to jail (or possible death penalty in some cases) and the people could get awarded for damages. I like justice. You should too.
Not dooming here; but, I feel that the courts are just too corrupt for this to happen. The enemy is quite brazen, lately... so, a miscarriage of justice is to be reasonably expected by now. Judges were totally "in on" the lockdowns, mandates etc.
But, if what Dr. McCullough says were successfully pursued; could that then "go viral" all over the world and spread to other countries after USA case precedence is set? There is already a lot of talk about "Nuremberg 2.0."
This is all sooooo YUGE that it does require a cooperative international response. Not sure calling it "Nuremberg" would be wise considering how full of shit the history we've been taught about it is. Anyway. Under what authorities? Military? Insert Trump era E.O.'s??? Any day would be nice. I understand timing is important.
No matter what or how these things MUST come to pass. The threats the death CULTure criminal organizations pose to humanity MUST be neutralized. They have already gained too much ground, IMHO.
Well, Q does say class action is a powerful tool... drops 1105, 1103, 1102 and 830... Dr. McCullough makes a very strong argument for criminal charges and I agree with him and you on that... If precedent were set here in the U.S, I believe many countries would follow suit... Of course I believe in justice but like you said, many courts have been corrupted by big money... as for Nuremberg 2.0, that term has been floating around for a year or more. And yes I'm aware of the history... Reiner Fulmecht brought some of these topics up to the ICC at the Hague and was shot down so I don't know if using them would be ideal... Cheers fren