Anons have been well trained over the years not to react to dates or what seems like important events/markers. At the same time, it is always exciting to look forward to something big that seems possible. For Brunson Case, the one thing that stands out for me is the 1/6 conference date. If SCOTUS had to dismiss it, they could have kept it for conference on 12/2 or 12/9 and be over it without creating this noise. Let's see what happens!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Interesting take on this case....
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/30/the-truth-about-the-brunson-case/
The article has valid points but I do think that it missed 1 or 2 critical points such as:
I totally understand that SCOTUS should not have power to remove congress members and sitting president. But what the article missed was that voter fraud or rather aiding voter fraud which is the main allegation in Brunson case comes under treason which gives authority to SCOTUS to remove all these members and is covered under the constitution. The article never discussed this point which is unique to this case.
Conference date of 1/6 as mentioned above which is odd, especially if SCOTUS just wants to dismiss it without noise.
Anyways, I guess we will know soon!!