I'm aware and don't even necessarily support digital currency. Gold and silver is better the way I see it.
But my statement was accurate. The guy clearly doesn't know about what he's railing against, and I'd lean towards you not being much of a crypto expert either.
Trust me, I'm aware. I'm far from tech illiterate. And to be clear, I don't know much about crypto either. However, I believe I have decent intuition. And my intuition tells me that the other guy doesn't really know anything about the tech. My intuition also tells me that, other than crypto as you agreed, you do have a good idea of what you're talking about on these kinds of things (and may be correct regarding crypto as well).
However, this is also kind of giving off vibes similar to a scientist claiming they know what they're talking about on climate change, because they have a degree in/are an expert/knowledgeable in biochemistry.
Regardless, I certainly agree that a secure computer isn't possible in the current environment.
And to be clear, while I maybe could have worded it better, my original point was solely what it says. That I don't think the guy is very knowledgeable on the subject. He may very well be correct, I didn't intend to make a claim on that, but regardless I would wager it's from a place closer to ignorance and rejection of the new/of technology than knowledge or understanding of the tech.
I'm aware and don't even necessarily support digital currency. Gold and silver is better the way I see it.
But my statement was accurate. The guy clearly doesn't know about what he's railing against, and I'd lean towards you not being much of a crypto expert either.
Trust me, I'm aware. I'm far from tech illiterate. And to be clear, I don't know much about crypto either. However, I believe I have decent intuition. And my intuition tells me that the other guy doesn't really know anything about the tech. My intuition also tells me that, other than crypto as you agreed, you do have a good idea of what you're talking about on these kinds of things (and may be correct regarding crypto as well).
However, this is also kind of giving off vibes similar to a scientist claiming they know what they're talking about on climate change, because they have a degree in/are an expert/knowledgeable in biochemistry.
Regardless, I certainly agree that a secure computer isn't possible in the current environment.
And to be clear, while I maybe could have worded it better, my original point was solely what it says. That I don't think the guy is very knowledgeable on the subject. He may very well be correct, I didn't intend to make a claim on that, but regardless I would wager it's from a place closer to ignorance and rejection of the new/of technology than knowledge or understanding of the tech.