Anons - been chewing on this one all day, and the theory works on multiple levels. Feel free to comment or discuss:
First off - let’s assume for a moment that pain is coming. You cannot force societal change until pain (or the very real threat of pain) is upon the people. Now as we analyze the current banking situation - who feels the brunt of this pain? While we will get our share, it is inordinately on our adversaries. I can do without for a couple of days. Can they? But I digress.
The narrative has quickly shifted to “Trump caused this”. And as childish as the argument seems - they may actually be right. And that is ok. I will explain why.
What was Trump’s signature play against his competition in the elections and during his public time in office? He always used the enemies moves against them by setting them up with irresistible bait. A “wacko” tweet, a declaration of a new enemy, etc. They never could resist and would go all in on attacking that thing, only to be proven utterly wrong. This happened countless times.
Now, suppose Trump did the same thing with various policies? Banking, transportation safety, trade, etc? Would this not be far too great a carrot for adversaries to not try to exploit? Problem is, they got desperate and greedy and the system collapsed on them when they did (possibly because other revenue streams dried up).
Now why would Trump and the White Hats do this? Because the reaction to this disaster will be the only one globalists know how to do…protect their pals and spend more money. This does two things, it further embitters voters from the statists and it starts to set the Fed up as the holder of risk. Now suppose more pain comes before the Fed has a chance to offload that risk onto taxpayers? See what’s happening here?
But let’s talk about the first part, embittering the citizens of this nation - because that is how you force change. Only when enough are awake and threatened will they revolt against the system and call for a new one. No matter how the current leadership reacts, they will destroy what little credibility they have left. And with it destroy the system they created. All the while, Donald Trump will be safely removed from the dumpster fire (key part of the plan) so that blame is placed at the feet of those who destroyed it.
“It’s the economy stupid” are words that every half wit politician should remember but seem to forget. It is about to make them look real stupid.
Last thing - why would we let pain happen. Remember this is an existential crisis. “We are in this for the species boys and girls”. The end is most certainly not for everyone. While I feel for the patriots that are hurting through all this - I suspect the pain is running much deeper for those that would gleefully watch our demise.
True…but what policies would have done this? To speculate further we would need to know what specifically would be the potential catalyst and how
I am digging into this now. I think many of his efforts to deregulate and make it easier for the small business to compete is a good starting point. It works for honest people but would be taken advantage of by bad actors. He likely would have known that they would try to exploit any policy he put in place.
What were those though?
Like, I understand the theory, but you're talking about an irresistable carrot that caused a bank collapse without knowing what the carrot is. It's just not easy to see if there's anything to exploit that would have failed the banks, let alone if it was the actualy cause of the collapse.