No it's really rather simple. The OP made an assertion without backing it up with a source. It's incumbent on the OP to back up such an assertion, not on the readers to go off randomly searching for supporting data. Personally, I suspect the assertion is either true or at least partly true, but it is OP's obligation to give supporting data to any assertion he/she makes. That is how critical thinking works: Assertion, backed up by sources, allowing readers to understand the OP's point.
I will give an upvote if you can provide sauce for this... article? ....study? ...data?
Plenty of articles on the use of HIV to break down your immune system to allow mRNA to run free. Stick your nose into the internet.
HIV doesn't exist.
Aides is the key.
No it's really rather simple. The OP made an assertion without backing it up with a source. It's incumbent on the OP to back up such an assertion, not on the readers to go off randomly searching for supporting data. Personally, I suspect the assertion is either true or at least partly true, but it is OP's obligation to give supporting data to any assertion he/she makes. That is how critical thinking works: Assertion, backed up by sources, allowing readers to understand the OP's point.