Admittedly, I am just a civilian but, this doesn't seem all that plausible to me.
I know the USN has nukes and their own intelligence division, but they have a rather limited scope and (from the outside) appear to be the most political in the officer class.
OTOH, they would have an easier time meeting in secret I suppose.
I don't know. Maybe you guys have more experience in the armed forces that contradict what my limited exposure suggests.
Ex-Navy, vet, Vietnam. Top secret, later classified SOG.
I will tell everyone that USN is divided into many layers; the exposed part is as most of you seem to think, a relatively limited mil confined to sea activities along with the Corps.
It is not. USN has branches doing R&D in areas far beyond what you see, and far beyond what is 'leaked'. As an instance, between 2000-2010, we started seeing "pirate" videos of the USN 'rail gun'. In my field, electronics, we knew of the rail gun in the mid-1970s; some of us (3 engineers) built one at the time. Worked.
Other research they do I can't disclose and remain among you, but you will know in time.
Those who are 'patriots' are very much so, along with the Corps.
What you see is NOT what you get.
I doubt Q is primarily Navy/USMC. Pretty sure, as all you should be, that the movement encompasses all services, but somewhat shielded from public view.
Some isn't patented, either. Based on my own examination of some of those patents, I suspect they are for distraction. One instance is the power source for 'high energy space based lasers'; the source was/is homopolar/superconductor, with the paper done by UC Los Alamos, 1974, printed formally Feb 1975. It describes the homopolar generator capable of supplying more than 6 MW for the laser. The laser itself was proofed in succeeding years, and I saw one in Silicon Valley in 1979, still operational. The engineer I was working with stated that the thing had shot down junk sats through a clamshell roof on the building, directly above the laser.
Considering the studies I've done, both for my work and otherwise, I'm inclined to think that most stuff based on QM is for show, and not the real stuff. There is direct evidence that a project was on in 1936-38 at Los Alamos that used Tesla's "electric flying machine", or so it appears. That was/is based on aether theory, which was 'scrapped' by the robber barons in the period 1920 on, substituting QM. If you're technically inclined, you can go through all the equations prior to 1900, and you'll find the originals much cleaner than the QM versions. I prefer to not discuss this sort of thing, because most people think it's nuts. However, I will say that the 'phi wave theory of everything' makes more sense hardware-wise than the QM stuff. At least, that is what I found in more than 3 decades in my field.
But that would negate the control of the 'barons' over energy supplies. Don't need to say more about that.
Always been a huge military supporter, but I find myself getting blackpilled these days. Helps to be reminded there are still patriots in the mix even if it doesn't always seem like it from what little we are allowed to know.
There is much, much more. From the days of the Nam, I read a lot of stuff from how Australia "held up" the US mil; since I flew everywhere there, as helo crew, I can say unequivocally that I saw mainly ROKs, very few Aussies. None were involved in the ops we carried out. Ground may have been different, but we flew fire support, and I didn't see much of anyone but US.
In our group, the comment about naval officers was partly true; jgs would come in, but they got the clue fast. Our crews were even, 2 officers, 2 enlisted. Senior officers were informed that the enlisted crews had been trained to get them out of enemy territory, and so weren't as stratified.
Almost everyone I have encountered since then, young and old, is willing to support the flag and what it stands for, not the govt.
Pretty sure a very large majority of the conservatives (rather say 'rednecks' though) was and is ready for a major altercation. Those people began their preparations back in the days of Clinton, and it got much, much worse during Shrub and Oturd. No one really knows what munitions are out there, but it's a guarantee it's more than the estimates. Remember, Trump loosened the regs, and imports/surplus sales went through the roof. A clue can be got just from what was done to Coke, Target, Bud in recent years: those people have most of the guns and what goes with, along with a lot of homemade stuff: remember, many vets were trained in that (field expedient), and they taught the others.
Years ago, the III% crowd and the OKs got in the mix. Those inclined to militia activities discovered quickly those orgs were infiltrated, and formed smaller and more effective groups, virtually everywhere. Even if the mil were in support of the cabal, the shit they would encounter would be terrible on their side.
But the main thing is that worldwide, you can see the crumbling of the globalist empire, and that itself speaks that the mil and Trump et al are hard at work, and certainly not for the globs.
Mostly Navy and Marine officers?
Admittedly, I am just a civilian but, this doesn't seem all that plausible to me.
I know the USN has nukes and their own intelligence division, but they have a rather limited scope and (from the outside) appear to be the most political in the officer class.
OTOH, they would have an easier time meeting in secret I suppose.
I don't know. Maybe you guys have more experience in the armed forces that contradict what my limited exposure suggests.
Ex-Navy, vet, Vietnam. Top secret, later classified SOG. I will tell everyone that USN is divided into many layers; the exposed part is as most of you seem to think, a relatively limited mil confined to sea activities along with the Corps. It is not. USN has branches doing R&D in areas far beyond what you see, and far beyond what is 'leaked'. As an instance, between 2000-2010, we started seeing "pirate" videos of the USN 'rail gun'. In my field, electronics, we knew of the rail gun in the mid-1970s; some of us (3 engineers) built one at the time. Worked. Other research they do I can't disclose and remain among you, but you will know in time. Those who are 'patriots' are very much so, along with the Corps.
What you see is NOT what you get.
I doubt Q is primarily Navy/USMC. Pretty sure, as all you should be, that the movement encompasses all services, but somewhat shielded from public view.
The amount of patents for exotic tech published by the USN is staggering, from instantaneous interstellar comms to stargate travel and ZPE machines.
Some isn't patented, either. Based on my own examination of some of those patents, I suspect they are for distraction. One instance is the power source for 'high energy space based lasers'; the source was/is homopolar/superconductor, with the paper done by UC Los Alamos, 1974, printed formally Feb 1975. It describes the homopolar generator capable of supplying more than 6 MW for the laser. The laser itself was proofed in succeeding years, and I saw one in Silicon Valley in 1979, still operational. The engineer I was working with stated that the thing had shot down junk sats through a clamshell roof on the building, directly above the laser. Considering the studies I've done, both for my work and otherwise, I'm inclined to think that most stuff based on QM is for show, and not the real stuff. There is direct evidence that a project was on in 1936-38 at Los Alamos that used Tesla's "electric flying machine", or so it appears. That was/is based on aether theory, which was 'scrapped' by the robber barons in the period 1920 on, substituting QM. If you're technically inclined, you can go through all the equations prior to 1900, and you'll find the originals much cleaner than the QM versions. I prefer to not discuss this sort of thing, because most people think it's nuts. However, I will say that the 'phi wave theory of everything' makes more sense hardware-wise than the QM stuff. At least, that is what I found in more than 3 decades in my field. But that would negate the control of the 'barons' over energy supplies. Don't need to say more about that.
Zero Point Energy.
Thanks for sharing what you can.
Always been a huge military supporter, but I find myself getting blackpilled these days. Helps to be reminded there are still patriots in the mix even if it doesn't always seem like it from what little we are allowed to know.
There is much, much more. From the days of the Nam, I read a lot of stuff from how Australia "held up" the US mil; since I flew everywhere there, as helo crew, I can say unequivocally that I saw mainly ROKs, very few Aussies. None were involved in the ops we carried out. Ground may have been different, but we flew fire support, and I didn't see much of anyone but US. In our group, the comment about naval officers was partly true; jgs would come in, but they got the clue fast. Our crews were even, 2 officers, 2 enlisted. Senior officers were informed that the enlisted crews had been trained to get them out of enemy territory, and so weren't as stratified. Almost everyone I have encountered since then, young and old, is willing to support the flag and what it stands for, not the govt. Pretty sure a very large majority of the conservatives (rather say 'rednecks' though) was and is ready for a major altercation. Those people began their preparations back in the days of Clinton, and it got much, much worse during Shrub and Oturd. No one really knows what munitions are out there, but it's a guarantee it's more than the estimates. Remember, Trump loosened the regs, and imports/surplus sales went through the roof. A clue can be got just from what was done to Coke, Target, Bud in recent years: those people have most of the guns and what goes with, along with a lot of homemade stuff: remember, many vets were trained in that (field expedient), and they taught the others. Years ago, the III% crowd and the OKs got in the mix. Those inclined to militia activities discovered quickly those orgs were infiltrated, and formed smaller and more effective groups, virtually everywhere. Even if the mil were in support of the cabal, the shit they would encounter would be terrible on their side.
But the main thing is that worldwide, you can see the crumbling of the globalist empire, and that itself speaks that the mil and Trump et al are hard at work, and certainly not for the globs.