“I think we’ve come full circle” implies that AI can now do what humans used to do.
I’m illustrating that 99.9% of the users here don’t realize that that moment happened in 2002 at the latest, and AI has been used for very, very evil things for more than a decade. OPs post displays a childlike ignorance of the world we actually live in, which was my point.
My posts—and the content I provide—are meant to be illustrative, not offensive.
I don't think your links prove at all that AI has been able to make the art it can now since 2002. The second two are pretty basic implementations of neuroencephalography, and the first is... What are you even implying with that first link?
You have no idea what AI can already do.
Are you ready for the world you've already been living in for more than a decade?
"I SAW THAT AI CAN DO ART ON THE INTERNETS!!!!!!!"
Oh, you sweet, sweet, naive child................
I think OP's point was to contrast the beauty of the AI painting to the heinous product of the human mind. Not the fact that AI can produce art.
And I think you missed my point entirely…
“I think we’ve come full circle” implies that AI can now do what humans used to do.
I’m illustrating that 99.9% of the users here don’t realize that that moment happened in 2002 at the latest, and AI has been used for very, very evil things for more than a decade. OPs post displays a childlike ignorance of the world we actually live in, which was my point.
My posts—and the content I provide—are meant to be illustrative, not offensive.
I don't think your links prove at all that AI has been able to make the art it can now since 2002. The second two are pretty basic implementations of neuroencephalography, and the first is... What are you even implying with that first link?
MK Ultra is not the same concept... let's talk about how MK works: https://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/the-world-of-mind-control-through-the-eyes-of-an-artist-with-13-alter-personas/