"What is the best way to present evidence of election theft in the current environment? Answer: by indicting Trump for, essentially, lying about the 2020 election.

The recent indictments against Trump et al by Jack Smith and Fani Willis fundamentally rest upon the allegation that Trump has been lying about the 2020 election; if you read the indictments closely, you’ll see that this is the “crime” that gives rise to all the other alleged crimes for which Trump et al stand accused. One could argue that, through these indictments, the very act of disagreeing with the mainstream is being criminalized.

Nonetheless, in both cases, the prosecution has a serious problem: what if Trump has been telling the truth this whole time?

As a defendant, Trump has discovery powers and (at least in theory) can use these powers to place evidence of election fraud onto the court record; this could be huge, given the fact that 50 previous cases related to election fraud have been dismissed on standing, rather than because of any problem with the evidence brought forward in said cases. We haven’t had a proper hearing yet regarding election fraud, but now that Trump has been made the defendant in these cases, he MUST be given the opportunity to prove that he’s been telling the truth—this is a requirement of due process.

Will the NY and GA courts do the right thing? That remains to be seen. Perhaps these cases will reach a just conclusion—or, if they are mishandled, perhaps the Supreme Court may weigh in. Indeed, if evidence of election fraud makes it before the Supreme Court, then that could open a massive can of worms for the Biden administration…

To be quite frank, this looks like a set-up to me."

....

Either Jack Smith and Fani Willis are desperate to get Trump on anything they can, and have served up the best they’ve got, or perhaps it’s the case that these indictments were crafted to give Trump precisely the ammo he needs to proceed with the next phase of the 5G war. Either way, they have been filed, and there’s no going back now.

If it’s part of “the plan,” then what further evidence of coordination might we find?

....

Possible Fulfillment of a Comm? White Squall Revisited What if I told you that the events of today were predicted years ago by an anonymous insider on 4chan?

It is my opinion that White Squall—a movie about a ragtag group of boys who are taken out to sea by a captain named Skipper, where they brave numerous storms ending with a giant tidal wave—is meant to be understood as a narrative-metaphor for the journey that Trump, Q, and Anons have been on since Q first appeared on the scene in October 2017.

....

In a nutshell, Skipper gets placed on trial for doing the best he can with his ship and crew while facing enormous, destructive natural forces. Does that sound familiar?

Most importantly, at the very end of White Squall, the Skipper is redeemed by his surviving crew, who stand by him during his trial. In a similar manner, loyal Anons are stepping into their role as the New News (“you are the news now” – Q), and are thereby helping to shape the social/informational landscape in a way that assists Trump to get his fair hearing. (When it comes to highly politicized proceedings, what happens in a courtroom is often downstream from what happens in the court of public opinion).

Could all of this be happening right now by accident? Or are we witnessing the fulfillment of a very long and detailed plan?

It’s deeply ironic that Trump et al are accused of engaging in a massive conspiracy.

Perhaps they are …

WWG1WGA!