I’m a contrarian but my opinion
1: no one has ever created an AI that wrote itself..which is basically the definition of AI. It’s them programming billions of datapoints to pull from but it still can’t write itself. Just like you can program pro chess games but it doesn’t learn how to play chess without inputs
2: if we really think there are counter plays like encryption hacks going on then we can’t simultaneously believe Q is in control. It’s been YEARS. If they somehow are surprising us at this point we already lost.
Based on the links posted by c5 above, one purpose of AGI is to be self-contained and self-perpetuating, without needing human interaction. That's both exciting and scary (to me) at the same time. It may also be what people were freaking out about going on behind the scenes with OpenAI's Altman, and why people like Elon, who have warned about potential dangers of AI, were pressing them to divulge further details.
I’m a contrarian but my opinion 1: no one has ever created an AI that wrote itself..which is basically the definition of AI. It’s them programming billions of datapoints to pull from but it still can’t write itself. Just like you can program pro chess games but it doesn’t learn how to play chess without inputs
2: if we really think there are counter plays like encryption hacks going on then we can’t simultaneously believe Q is in control. It’s been YEARS. If they somehow are surprising us at this point we already lost.
Based on the links posted by c5 above, one purpose of AGI is to be self-contained and self-perpetuating, without needing human interaction. That's both exciting and scary (to me) at the same time. It may also be what people were freaking out about going on behind the scenes with OpenAI's Altman, and why people like Elon, who have warned about potential dangers of AI, were pressing them to divulge further details.
I have never seen nor heard that as being anyone's definition of AI before. Citation needed.