Exposing pedo Spacey at a cost of degrading Tucker? I'll take it. I think we'll see more and more of these bizarre events as the awakening intensifies. More divisions and more subdivisions.
IMHO, important thing always to focus on is the message, not the messenger. The messengers just play their roles in time and space allocated. If we focus on characterizing the messengers, we lose the chance to see the message. It also shines light on ourselves, the commenters.
I respect your efforts at seeing the bigger picture. But oftentimes I think that because of Q has us trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, because “ the military is in control” . Much has changed since Q first started. And although I won hundred percent believe in its premise, it was written by fallible humans, who may have since gotten into trouble, even perhaps killed. I hope not , but we just don’t know, do we.
Then again, “misdirection on both sides is important.” Maybe Tucker is trying to throw us off?
Exposing pedo Spacey at a cost of degrading Tucker? I'll take it. I think we'll see more and more of these bizarre events as the awakening intensifies. More divisions and more subdivisions.
IMHO, important thing always to focus on is the message, not the messenger. The messengers just play their roles in time and space allocated. If we focus on characterizing the messengers, we lose the chance to see the message. It also shines light on ourselves, the commenters.
I respect your efforts at seeing the bigger picture. But oftentimes I think that because of Q has us trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, because “ the military is in control” . Much has changed since Q first started. And although I won hundred percent believe in its premise, it was written by fallible humans, who may have since gotten into trouble, even perhaps killed. I hope not , but we just don’t know, do we. Then again, “misdirection on both sides is important.” Maybe Tucker is trying to throw us off?