Theyvare bringing awareness to a way larger audience.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
fair question. part of fog of war perhaps. it's hard to know who is good vs evil. take Budweiser (anheuser-busch) for example. Patriots (seemingly) such as Dana White have recently shown support for Budweiser after their attempt to push trans fantasy. why? could it be that Bud is a white hat which took a bullet (big one financially) in an all out effort to awaken the sheep? heck if I know, but it sure seems plausible. how else can we explain some of these outrageous missteps by certain corporations that have never shown these tendencies before?
same with Amazon/Bezos? unlikely I'd say but maybe the white hats have him by the balls so he's cooperating or maybe he's been playinga role for a while.
heck, there's indications that Jim Caviezel could be a black hat. we always need to be reevaluating.
I do plan to watch it tonight on Prime. interested to see how I interpret it's message/s. even though I've read numerous reviews on GAW and other sources that praise the movie, I pride myself on coming to my own conclusions
replying to my own post rather than an edit...just watched the flick and while well acted and shines light on horrific nature of child trafficking it fails in many aspects. not portrayed as elite drug. no mention of adrenochrome or child sacrifice. fails to really connect it to an American problem. fails to portray the involvement, or at least complicity, of US and worldwide 3 letter agencies and organizations.
for example, rescue mission involves hero using United Nations credentials as cover even though in a real story UN would be involved in the trafficking. final credits mention how Tim Ballard's efforts resulted in Congress passing some legislation. no chance these satanic creatures passed anything of substance imho
true white hat movie? I'm not entirely sold, FWIW