FBI charged with Jan. 6 ‘cover-up’ in Ashli Babbitt shooting case - The Great Awakening

FBI charged with Jan. 6 ‘cover-up’ in Ashli Babbitt shooting case (www.washingtonexaminer.com)

posted 334 days ago by LakotaPride 334 days ago by LakotaPride +178 / -0

FBI charged with Jan. 6 ‘cover-up’ in Ashli Babbitt shooting case

A watchdog group is escalating its battle with the Justice Department over the FBI’s refusal to turn over files on Ashli Babbitt, the United States Air Force veteran shot and killed during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot over the certification of President ...

10 comments

10 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (10)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– BakasEverywhere 3 points 333 days ago +3 / -0

The FBI hasn't been charged with anything in regards to Babbitt. Judicial watch filed a FOIA suit against them. Being charged with something and having a suit filed against you are two completely separate things.

Criminal charges are brought against a person in one of three ways:

Through an indictment voted by a grand jury.
Through the filing of information by the prosecuting attorney (also called the county, district, or state's attorney) alleging that a crime was committed. Sometimes charges are pressed through the filing of a criminal complaint by another individual, which is essentially a petition to the district attorney asking him/her to initiate charges.
Through a citation by a police officer for minor traffic offenses and the like. This procedure is usually used for certain petty misdemeanors and other minor criminal matters.

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/bringingcharge/

I don't know if the author of that article doesn't know the difference between the two or if they're deliberately doing it to sway public opinion. Either way, it's extremely unprofessional.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– LakotaPride [S] 1 point 333 days ago +1 / -0

This goes back several decades ago. LE investigates the alleged crime. Charges depend on how many element you can prove at trial. Depending on how many elements you can prove will decide what charge you can bring on the suspect. LE goes before a magistrate to swear out a WFA. If there is enough to statisfy the magistrate a WFA will be issued.

The arrest is made and sent to the DA, sometimes you are subpoenaed to testify before a Grand Jury. Many times you reveive notice from the clek of courts it is going to trial or a plea bargain was reached by the DA's office. There are times the DA or ADA may join in a investigation.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– BakasEverywhere 1 point 332 days ago +1 / -0

This goes back several decades ago.

What does? How the court system works? It goes back much further than that.

I'll be honest, I have no idea what your point is here and I'm wondering if you understood the point of mine.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q