Don’t Let The ‘Christian Nationalist’ Slur Shame You Into Hiding Your Faith
(thefederalist.com)
FIFTH GEN WARFARE
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Anyone trying to talk about 'Christian Nationalists' at you...
A) Ask them bluntly:
"Can you give me the name of any group that self-identifies as 'Christian Nationalists' or is about 'Christian Nationalism', where their self-identification is clearly outlined as 'Christian Nationalists', and they have guidelines or rules of governing their 'Christian Nationalism'? Provide the following: 1) their full name, 2) where specifically they self-identify as 'Christian Nationalists' (or express their 'Christian Nationalism'), 3) their guidelines or rules for being a 'Christian Nationalist' or what they do as such."
I like this approach, because it gets them every time and turns them into blabbering idiots that you can easily swat down. eg:
"But wikipedia says.." "Re-read the question and provide the details, is your propapedia not giving you anything?"
"But ChatGPT says.." "Re-read the question and provide the details, bAIs isn't giving you anything?"
"But MSM says..." "So where are the groups or guidelines for so-called groups?"
"But this expert researcher found out.." "So why didn't your 'expert researcher' to point to the groups and guidelines for their so-called groups? Can you even still call them an 'expert' if they don't?"
"But this single person/politician said.." "One person isn't a group, do you have any groups, with their guidelines?"
"I just know they are.." "I just know men saying they are women are mentally ill, does that give me the right to identify them as such when they self identify as a woman?"
B) If you don't want to go through the hassle of A), reply..
"Oh! So, you're one of those atheist/anti-theist/socialist/marxist nationalists? LOL!"
They'll hate you for it and get all angry that you turned the tables on them. If need be you can hammer it home with A)
Or go with the columbo tactic, ask them open ended questions such as "what do you mean by that?" And "how did you come to that conclusion?" And force them with their own nonfunctional brain to defend their position
I have done that before anon, which is why i go to A) or B) now. The difference here is time. Once I realized all these shills are all the same and i was wasting time on each, i just went for the jugular. Its more fun watching them trying to deal with it and wasting their time to do so.
I like option B.
Short and to the point....