She asked to be allowed to reply and attached her reply. Apparently the judge said NO. Remove your reply and wait.
The same day, this Court directed the Attorney General to “remove the proposed sur-reply and only return the letter request for sur-reply providing a general explanation for why a sur-reply should be permitted without argument.” Later that evening, the Attorney General filed a revised, one-paragraph letter requesting leave to file the proposed Surreply.
This request should be denied. The Attorney General’s incredibly short letter provides only a cursory request and no specific rationale for filing a surreply. Moreover, even if the Court were to consider the improperly filed Surreply—which it should not do—**the Court should reject it. **
Yeah, yesterday she replied to his motion asking for more time and today they replied and asked the judge to tell her to butt out.
I can't find the actual motion yet, but I wanted to post it earlier.
Oh, The Fox News Articple GWP points to has the full document
She asked to be allowed to reply and attached her reply. Apparently the judge said NO. Remove your reply and wait.