I feel like this is an extremely unpopular opinion but I really don't think republicanism was a step forward for humanity.
Monarchy is the most intuitive form of government. People tend to take care of what they own, and politicians have no incentive to leave anything better for the next generation because they really have no stake in their country. Their legacy dies with them.
A monarchy with constitutional (and familial) checks and balances is vastly preferable to a republic where the foreign interests run free and loot the taxpayers. It's pure and much simpler. No Congress, no Supreme Court, no ridiculous sham elections. Everyone knows who's in charge and what the rules are.
good monarchy is appropriate for its time and place.
a republic is more suited for a more evolved society.
we're finding out the hard way that republics just get bought out by rich pedos.
this is along the similar lines of the Roman Republic, ruled by a secret cabal of elites (1st and 2nd triumvirates).
No, dummy. those are RINOs, not republicans. we haven't achieved or been able to keep a real republic.
when we achieve a real republic, we can look closer at what better forms of government might come next. but for now, it remains a good goal.
real republicanism hasn't been tried yet.
drink some water... only very dehydrated people conflate communism and republicanism
Is our society really more evolved when people are killing babies and no one knows that gender they are?