Clarence Thomas Asks If Jack Smith Is Appointment Illegal
'He wields tremendous power, effectively answerable to no one...'
(headlineusa.com)
🔍 Notable
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Thomas’s inquiries likely stemmed from the 42-page amicus brief filed by Meese and Mukasey, which suggested that Smith—who was appointed by Democratic Attorney General Merrick Garland—lacked the requisite authority to prosecute Trump, having never received Senate confirmation.
Fraud vitiates EVERYTHING!!!
First you have to get the proper people to acknowledge the fraud. Then you have to get them to do something about it. Thus far I haven't seen either occur.
Exactly, this is the question they did not wish to hear.