sry for the stupid post, but i just gotta put this one flattard shill on blast
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
You have ignored that I said refraction doesn't explain why you can see beyond the curve.
The curve is a belief, not verifiable. No laser test, no camera, nothing except government provided images of earth from space, nothing that proves anything.
I can send you a video that totally explains southern starts appearing rotation, so what, you won't get it, you won't even watch it. You changed the subject because you can't solve the missing curve problem.
So, misusing the word refraction is not address the main point that debunks all globe and space. No curve. Literally no other points matter.
in my view, because the sky rotates around one point in the northern hemisphere and another in the south, its clear that we live on a globe, and any other theory is far-fetched. you've said refraction can't explain what we observe at the horizon, but you haven't backed that up. beers law does account for some loss of visibility at greater distances, but is still consistent with the real curve. refraction too is perfectly consistent, regardless of how many times you say otherwise.
so please, link the vid.
I sent the link to refraction image, backed it up when I told you what refraction does. Moves the horizon down, artificially. It doesn't explain the point I nailed down about objects being visible well beyond the supposed mathematical limt
You just easily bought onto the deception.
Understanding your optical range while you observe stars is difficult.
But you are still stuck on basic physics and laws of optics.
Here you go. But you aren't ready for this.https://rumble.com/v142kjq-eric-dubay-southern-stars-in-a-stationary-non-spinning-earth.html