Democrats Hint At Assassination In Response To Supreme Court Immunity Decision - The Great Awakening

111

Democrats Hint At Assassination In Response To Supreme Court Immunity Decision (www.zerohedge.com)

posted 169 days ago by RC22 169 days ago by RC22 +111 / -0

Democrats Hint At Assassination In Response To Supreme Court Immunity Decision

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

13 comments

13 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (13)

sorted by:

▲ 10 ▼

– RC22 [S] 10 points 169 days ago +10 / -0

“President Biden, acting within the scope of his official duties, could dispatch the military to take out the conservative justices on the Court” - Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA)

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– WhiteHairedJudge 1 point 169 days ago +1 / -0

This was an argument raised by Trump's lawyers.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4398223-trump-team-argues-assassination-of-rivals-is-covered-by-presidential-immunity/

Former President Trump’s legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive’s broad immunity to criminal prosecution.

The hypothetical was presented to Trump attorney John Sauer who answered with a “qualified yes” that a former president would be immune from prosecution on that matter or even on selling pardons.

Sauer argued that presidents can only be criminally prosecuted if they have already been tried and convicted by the Senate.

“He would have to be impeached and convicted,” Sauer replied

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– RC22 [S] 1 point 169 days ago +1 / -0

interesting. I just read about Obama and the "kill policy" where Obama killed an american citizen with no trial.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q