interesting point about the SC immunity decision. any lawfags wanna address the second half of this?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
this is a discussion; it needs no link.
i could provide a link to the text of the supreme court decision, or links to the role of mens rea in the american legal system.
let me be clear:
I am an amateur law enthusiast....barely. I am not looking for answers from people with my own level of legal expertise. There are people on this board who actually know law. I am not one of them, and I suspect you aren't really either. unless its just the meds?
I respect the enthusiasm. I understand the urge to quash liberal arguments very well. not trying to be insulting. All of us here have different areas of expertise. But this is a moderately complex legal discussion, and if it sounds like word salad to you, then I don't think either of us are equipped to provide the answer. But someone here is.
EDIT: Genuinely, much love to the pede that replied with much vigor, and then removed their comments. I also wanted to tell this person they were a stupid liberal spewing nonsense, but what I wanted more was to provide an actual argument based in the law. I don't need to crowd-source rage against liberals....I have loads of that. Legal knowledge is where any response I could make would be lacking.
Not trying to be an ass to you. Really I wanted to understand it.
No, I'm not a lawyer. I have read a lot of the CFR for the VA, also their regulations that could be in trouble of because of Chevron Deference.
You Jew, you deleted your own comments...
No need to reply, blocked.