2nd shooter theory
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Problem is this guy is doing his presentations behind a Paytriot Paywall & putting up these images to draw people there. If you are gonna present this type of evidence it needs to be out in the open. I have seen him put out several trajectories that just make no sense. How do we know these people were hit by bullets & not just ducking? Where is the snipers perch? Yeah if the trajectory comes from Water Tower to person in crowd who was proveably hit & in line with Trump or another reasonable target, it might make sense, but trajectory lines going off from nowhere without an identiable legitimate target & a rational explaination unless you go to this site & pay him for it just serves to confuse & distract from the facts. He says the bullet hit 2 people & passed across an entire bleacher without anyone else getting hit & striking a railing just strains credibility to the breaking point. If he was legit, it would be out there in the open with evidence to back it up to get the truth out just like he did with Las Vegas, not behind a paywall on Patreon.
I presented what I’ve found for discussion. That’s what this is for, is it not? Have we not seen pretty sketchy, baseless claims form the Chans about a body swap? There very little to no basis for that either..
And, I discussed my belief on what I saw. I'm just surprised Cullin isn't presenting his methodology & evidence in detail in open forum as he did with Vegas instead of like this..Got a lot of respect for his ability from his previous work, but what I see from him here is lacking a rational explaination. That puff of smoke by the railing could be a pyro blank discharge going off under the bunting for all we know...not that I'm saying that is what it was.