This sounds really off to me, why is Jill included in this official letter. No one elected her. She isn’t involved at all (shouldn’t be involved). Why is he making a point of including her in the first sentence. Or whoever wrote that letter.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Oh believe me, she's involved. Has been for a long time.
Agreed