The leading theory is some kind of planned demolition. I would advise people to not fall into the planes/no-planes debate (it's a red herring), but focus on the collapse of WTC1, WTC2, & especially WTC7. These are all suspicious because of WTC7 being the smoking gun for the leading theory.
If anyone wants to focus on planes.. the focus should be on how little energy they contained, which is far less than what would have been required to bring WTC1/2 down to rubble to the very base floor as we saw.
The leading theory is some kind of planned demolition. I would advise people to not fall into the planes/no-planes debate (it's a red herring), but focus on the collapse of WTC1, WTC2, & especially WTC7. These are all suspicious because of WTC7 being the smoking gun for the leading theory.
If anyone wants to focus on planes.. the focus should be on how little energy they contained, which is far less than what would have been required to bring WTC1/2 down to rubble to the very base floor as we saw.
🎯