I've been thinking about this since the assassination attempt and I was halfway going to wait to see how my theory played out, but I decided to put it out there in case it plays out and we can know what we are seeing. Q has said couple times “It’s going to be biblical”. u/#q3565 u/#q3624 And we can all see the obvious interpretation of a battle of good versus evil but I always read more into it that there's something very specific that's going to be biblical and we were literally going to be able to see today's events tied to biblical events. Now, I certainly don't claim to know God's plan or have divine insight. This was something that occurred to me when trump got shot in the ear and had the blood on the tip of his ear. In Exodus, there are verses where God is telling Moses to consecrate Aaron and his sons as priests:
Exodus 29:1,20 - “And this is the thing that thou shalt do unto them to hallow them, to minister unto me in the priest’s office: Take one young bullock, and two rams without blemish… Then shalt thou kill the ram, and take of his blood, and put it upon the tip of the right ear of Aaron, and upon the tip of the right ear of his sons, and upon the thumb of their right hand, and upon the great toe of their right foot and sprinkle the blood upon the altar round about.” KJV (bullock=bull)
And when trump got shot he had blood on the tip of his right ear, just like the way Moses consecrated Aaron. Now we hear there may be another assassination attempt that will be tried. If there is one, I'm halfway thinking we see a bullet or knife or whatever graze his thumb or do something that puts blood on his thumb and maybe on his right toe the second time, or maybe during a third attempt. It would show us that God is consecrating President Trump to do his work as he officially goes forward to root out evil, corruption, pedophiles and the Satanists from this country and the world. So my theory is that this is the first step in God consecrating him. And IF this plays out that would definitely be Biblical, and show everyone (both non-Christians, and Christians that think Trump is Hitler) that God has chosen Trump to battle against the evil of this world.
Not negating what you are saying, I also saw the biblical thing as more significant than we knew. When Q would post, 'bigger than you can imagine', I also wondered what was more than I could imagine? Well there is only one thing I didn't think of and I now believe it's the timeline. I think we are beyond the return of Jesus living in Revelation 20:7 where Satan has been released for a little season to deceive the nations (doesn't that sum up our times?) If you have looked at the Tartaria rabbit hole at all, once you start to re-frame that as the 1000 year reign of Christ with the resurrected Saints, a lot of things make a lot more sense. If anyone knows this, it will be leaders like Trump, Putin, Bin Salman etc. as well as top BHs who have enacted a massive cover up of our true history. Think of it, everything comes together in the fact that Jesus is actually still the crowned, enthroned ruler of the world. We just didn't realize it. :-D
can I ask you a question, and I'm not trying to be facetious,
is there any scriptural evidence that the 'return of Christ' is actually the physical return of Jesus in the flesh?
Your comment doesn't sound facetious :-) I welcome the discussion. I think maybe you are referring to preterism? People who call themselves preterists believe that most of Revelation has already been fulfilled but they see Jesus' return as spiritual rather than actual. Orthodox Christianity tends to see full preterists as heretical, although many pastors are partial preterists who believe that some of Revelation was fullfilled around AD70 when the temple in Jerusalem was destroyed. Personally I see preterists as those who have thought through scripture more deeply and in ways most futurists (most people who believe Jesus has yet to return) just look the other way. There are many tricky passages where Jesus and the Apostles made significant claims about Jesus' imminent return in their lifetimes. Some of the scriptures are very specific eg. Nathanial was told he would see Jesus' return and a conversation about John also being alive then. Few realize that C.S. Lewis called these passages 'embarrassing' as it showed him that Jesus wasn't infallible. The preterists can't ignore these passges but where they go wrong is to negate the physical return imo. So yes I think there is plenty of evidence to back up a physical 2nd coming. If you believe that Jesus didn't lie or mislead and that he was infallible then you really should look at this idea that he has already returned.
how do I put this,
I think that trying to align it to a linear timeline is akin to 'datefagging' within those that follow 'Q', in a sense
I've heard various doctrines within different Christian denominations, thank you for elaborating a little, I hadn't seen those terms used before.
If you'll allow me to get really heretical, and I apologise in advance for this, I am seeing a perspective where no contradiction exists between these views.
At this point differing wildly from any tradition I've heard about, suppose we separate the concept of Jesus, the man, from 'Christ' as a principal. I am not suggesting that they are separate or that Jesus is not Christ.
From what I understand of the concepts you just introduced to me, this may be akin to 'preterism' so yes, like that, but also, something that hasn't yet happened and will return. Both having returned and returning.
I'm going to go 'right out-there' now, and I do so in good faith with the hope you might see my point and not take offense, as I don't know your personal religious beliefs. I don't know how familiar you are with other traditions and language frameworks, so I'll just 'take a chance' so to speak
suppose this 'Christ/messiah/saviour principle' is equivalent to 'buddha nature' within Buddhism. And I mean, directly equivalent. That the two 'languages' are fundamentally connected, describing the same thing.
this forms a sort of 'bridge' providing a way for the seemingly different languages to 'talk' to each other
this opens a whole new way of integrating other concepts that you may be familiar with, 'awakening' being the key one I am getting at
From this perspective, I don't believe it is heretical to say that the man Jesus, 'of the father' 'God' or ultimate reality 'Dharmakāya', himself 'awakened' a 'buddha', 'Christ' or possessing the 'buddha-nature', vowing, compelled through God's infinite love and mercy, or 'infinite radiating compassion', showed his followers 'the way' and ultimately sacrificed his life so that he may end the suffering of all sentient beings - that they may be 'saved' and have ever lasting life.
The part that WOULD be heretical, to a Christian, is to say that I don't believe Jesus was the only being that has awakened. I would propose an infinite procession of awakened beings, all taking this vow, radiating God's love and compassion throughout the infinite cosmos.
Ah but still, in this sense, only one 'Christ' principle or buddha nature
the potential of which to realise within every sentient being.
My ultimate point being, awakening itself.
Having come, coming and yet to come.
And if this were the case, given the potential within all beings to awaken, both as destination and process, 'nothing can stop what is coming.'
You are obviously a very considered person thinking these things through carefully. My response would be that yes in one sense the ultimate end of the goal of the world is a Great Awakening when everyone is faced with the truth that they have either sought or have turned away from, or ignored (enforced awakening).... But that is not my starting point. There is light and dark, without dark we do not comprehend what light is. All the opposites we know show us the comparison that makes us understand each side. (((An aside - I recall learnig that psychology tells us that children categorize early on and many pyschs feel that they need to learn how to limit their use of category choices and to see things more individually as that is more intelligent. I believe it is how children are made, to categorize, to make sense of the world and the idea that they should not be encouraged in this is one more lil form of subversion of the left. Mainstream psychology has also claimed that less educated people categorize more, in a similar way to their claim that the more enlightened among us are progressive. SMH))) My starting point in regard to spirituality is that we have evil and we have good (opposites). If you don't believe that, then you will not agree with my assertions. In the GA though I have seen many more non-Christians say that they now believe in evil (as a separate entity, even a devil figure) because of the covid/cabal they have now witnessed). If the world is designed by a Creator who is good (or at least benign), then it is logical to believe that He would try to communicate with us and reach out in ways we would understand and also teach us about the nature of evil and good. We have our experience, our language, our social desires, our industry etc. which our creator put in us intrinsically before sin crept into the world. Well I believe He did reach out in a way we could understand with our senses and intuitions and observations and that Jesus was God's son come down to save us. I think it all holds together (the Old Testament and the New Testament) and just like Q/45, nothing ever happens that unravels the narrative for me. The bible tells it all as it is and it is the ultimate solution for the world, for humanity. Futurism (a future second coming of Jesus) has actually unraveled the very idea of Jesus as Lord for many who don't want to wait 2000+ years of this stinky DS world for Him to come back to rule when he said He would be back much sooner. As I mentioned above, it was tricky for CS Lewis to consider, let alone someone who has little experience of theology or academic culture (I know many are now not convinced by CS Lewis' goodness, but I haven't dug on that one, so I take Lewis at face value). With regards to Buddism and other spiritual paths to awakening or God? Well Jesus told us that He was the only path to the Father (John 14:6). Frankly I know I am not good enough to ascend in my own power even on a good day. The power to ascend has to be powerful enough for the worst of us to be able to get there, not just those who are enlightened enough, educated enough, well enough or strong and disciplined enough. Jesus gave us the ability to receive His Spirit within us to do the job of purifying, teaching, guiding. Christianity is the only faith that says - You can't do this, so I, God will do it for you. Just rely on me, surrender to me and I will make your paths straight, I will bless you and be your loving God. Every other religion says we have to do this, that or the other in our own strength. What happens when that strength fails? Jesus says He will give us living waters to quench our thirst and soothe our troubled minds and bodies (John 7:37-39). The invitation to go to Him is clear, unequivocal and sublime. I am grateful that I belong to Him and I pray for many, many more anon and patriots, who are yearning for the truth of humanity to understand the invitation and to belong to Jesus too. We remain indebted to 45/Q for their incredible heavy lifting, we owe it to them to embrace Jesus and achieve as much as we can towards the ultimate goal of the Great Awakening.