This 'sealed indictments' trope has been going on for quite some time. While I don't doubt that such indictments exist, no one has ever satisfactorily answered the question: Who ARE these people under indictment?
I've heard every speculation out there... common criminals, traitors, Deep State functionaries, etc., but not one single whistle blower who has made a credible ID on any of these folks.
Sealed indictments are meant to protect ongoing investigations, and whistleblowers expose corruption, not sealed legal actions. Expecting names from sealed cases undermines the confidentiality of the legal process. The lack of public details doesn't mean indictments don't exist; it means the process is being followed correctly.
This 'sealed indictments' trope has been going on for quite some time. While I don't doubt that such indictments exist, no one has ever satisfactorily answered the question: Who ARE these people under indictment?
I've heard every speculation out there... common criminals, traitors, Deep State functionaries, etc., but not one single whistle blower who has made a credible ID on any of these folks.
Sealed indictments are meant to protect ongoing investigations, and whistleblowers expose corruption, not sealed legal actions. Expecting names from sealed cases undermines the confidentiality of the legal process. The lack of public details doesn't mean indictments don't exist; it means the process is being followed correctly.