The whole concept of voting in our election system, according to the founding principles of our Constitutional Republic, was 1 vote for one individual candidate. Ranked voting is a scheme that is not in accordance with a Republic government.
Ranked-choice voting is inherently unfair. Voters who select unpopular candidates as their first preference effectively vote again, sometimes multiple times. Why should some voters get numerous votes just because their first preference is unpopular?
With ranked voting, not all votes count. This goes against the principle that every vote counts. Ranked voting also makes cheating even easier, and counting even more complex.
In reality, ranked-choice voting is a scheme that makes it harder for independent candidates to win and is regularly being used by left-wing groups to undermine conservative candidates.
Sadly, many Americans lack confidence in the election process. While progressives offer RCV as a solution to this problem, such a needlessly complicated voting system leads to voter confusion, lower turnout, and slower election results. Strengthening the trust that the American people have in the election process should not be a partisan issue. Banning ranked-choice voting is a measure that everyone ought to support to protect election integrity.
It should also raise alarms that the 3 biggest financial backers of ranked voting are the George Soros-funded Open Society Foundations, Jennifer and Jonathan Allan Soros Foundation, and Soros Fund Charitable Foundation.
As our founders knew, one person, one vote is the best, and most fair method to decide elections. It’s worked for Americans for generations. There’s no good reason to change things now.
Ranked choice is unconstitutional, regardless of what the corrupted courts rule. Idaho needs to vote no to Proposition 1.
The whole concept of voting in our election system, according to the founding principles of our Constitutional Republic, was 1 vote for one individual candidate. Ranked voting is a scheme that is not in accordance with a Republic government.
Ranked-choice voting is inherently unfair. Voters who select unpopular candidates as their first preference effectively vote again, sometimes multiple times. Why should some voters get numerous votes just because their first preference is unpopular?
With ranked voting, not all votes count. This goes against the principle that every vote counts. Ranked voting also makes cheating even easier, and counting even more complex.
In reality, ranked-choice voting is a scheme that makes it harder for independent candidates to win and is regularly being used by left-wing groups to undermine conservative candidates.
Sadly, many Americans lack confidence in the election process. While progressives offer RCV as a solution to this problem, such a needlessly complicated voting system leads to voter confusion, lower turnout, and slower election results. Strengthening the trust that the American people have in the election process should not be a partisan issue. Banning ranked-choice voting is a measure that everyone ought to support to protect election integrity.
It should also raise alarms that the 3 biggest financial backers of ranked voting are the George Soros-funded Open Society Foundations, Jennifer and Jonathan Allan Soros Foundation, and Soros Fund Charitable Foundation.
As our founders knew, one person, one vote is the best, and most fair method to decide elections. It’s worked for Americans for generations. There’s no good reason to change things now.
Great information in your post! All Truths.
What in the constitution disallows it?